On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:48:24 +0200, ancow wrote:
Multiarch being a release goal, I'd consider this issue release critical, but
maybe that's just me...
Release goal very much implies not release critical.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Lisandro,
am Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:07:34PM -0300 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
On the other hand, IMPOV, if it's RC, the real bug it's on the buildds/dpkg,
and it should be RC too.
the buildds really don't have anything to do with it. Maybe the infrastructure
should prevent people from
On Mié 15 Aug 2012 08:52:55 Philipp Kern escribió:
Lisandro,
am Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:07:34PM -0300 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
On the other hand, IMPOV, if it's RC, the real bug it's on the
buildds/dpkg, and it should be RC too.
the buildds really don't have anything to do with
On Mar 14 Aug 2012 20:48:24 ancow escribió:
[snip]
Multiarch being a release goal, I'd consider this issue release critical,
but maybe that's just me...
This is the part I don't really know. If it's considered RC, then things
change, but so far no one confirmed nor denied me this.
On the
Am Mittwoch 15.08.2012, 01:24:48 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
We (as in pkg-kde team) have decided to avoid reuploading Qt for some more
time in case some other bug appears. On the other hand, I really don't know
if this kind of upload would be acceptable by the RT for unblock.
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 22:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of QT.
and have you discussed this with the maintainers, who requested the
binNMU? (CCed)
I aware of the technical debate on multiarch and binnum, it seems that all
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 22:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of QT.
and have you discussed this with the maintainers, who requested the
binNMU?
7 matches
Mail list logo
