Hi,
On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 20:36, Patrick Franz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree that solution a) sounds like the better option, especially since
> we've gone this route with Qt 5.
>
> However, I will revisit this issue once we have transitioned 6.4 into
> unstable.
It's up to you, but the patch is
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 20:07, Helmut Grohne wrote:
[snip]
> In any case, I've attached a patch for it now. It is based on what we do
> for qt5.
Thanks!
> I caution though that selecting version 5 or 6 is kinda messed up. If
> you run qmake6 or -qmake6, it'll use qt6 as expected. If you
>
Hi,
I agree that solution a) sounds like the better option, especially since
we've gone this route with Qt 5.
However, I will revisit this issue once we have transitioned 6.4 into
unstable.
--
Med vänliga hälsningar
Patrick Franz
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1025663 [qmake6] qmake6: how should users query for QT_INSTALL_PLUGINS?
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1025663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 10:27:18AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> I would very much prefer (a). Now, as you said, timing is important
> here. Do we need a pass through NEW? If that's the case then that will
> need to happen after the next transition,
Hi all,
as I was mentioned in this discussion...
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 10:27:18AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> I would very much prefer (a). Now, as you said, timing is important
> here. Do we need a pass through NEW? If that's the case then that will
> need to happen
Hi!
As usual I'm a little bit behind this with emails, so I just saw this.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 08:48, Helmut Grohne wrote:
[snip]
> I'd like to get some reply from Patrick before moving forward with this
> though. And it would be super awesome if this could be included in
> bookworm, so time
Hi Fab,
please keep debian-cr...@lists.debian.org in the loop. Full quoting.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:29:52AM +0100, Fab Stz wrote:
> Not sure this fits your issue and if this could work.
>
> I used to produce android-builds that are sort of 'target' builds (and not
> host builds). There is
Hello,
Not sure this fits your issue and if this could work.
I used to produce android-builds that are sort of 'target' builds (and not
host builds). There is a specific qmake to be called when building with a
target-build. That qmake is in the bin directory of the target build. And that
Package: qmake6
Version: 6.3.1+dfsg-10
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 + src:fcitx-qt5
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
we've hit an interesting issue with qmake for QT6. This almost certainly
is a pattern and I'll use
10 matches
Mail list logo
