-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > Even if gcc will soon adopt a patch to make -mieee the default,
> > there will be older versions of gcc around for a while. This is a
> > bug *now*, and there's no reason not to add the -mieee explicitly to
> > the compiler flags for the time bein
Greetings,
Here's a little m4 snippet you can stick into configure.in or .ac (from
my PETSc package's math-blaslapack.m4):
AC_DEFUN([ALPHA_MIEEE_CHECK],[
AC_CHECKING([whether -mieee is needed to avoid SIGFPE on divide by
zero])
case $build/$CC in
alpha*/gcc* )
package konqueror
reopen 203722
thanks
Steve Langasek writes:
>> I'm currently looking at the following bug report
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 about a
>> frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the cause
>> of this bug, namely the non-standard alp
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:54:06PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Please respect the Mail-Followup-To, as I'm not subscribed to this
> list, and the discussion is relevant to #203722.
> I'm currently looking at the following bug report
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722
Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently looking at the following bug report
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 about a
> frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the cause
> of this bug, namely the non-standard alpha FPU semantics.
>
Hi,
Please respect the Mail-Followup-To, as I'm not subscribed to this
list, and the discussion is relevant to #203722.
I'm currently looking at the following bug report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722
about a frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the
6 matches
Mail list logo
