Daniel said:
I don't see what I can really do about this. Dropping the static
libraries entirely would be a policy violation, and compiling static
libraries which contain just one big .o file wouldn't be much better.
Reading policy about static libs[1] says The static library
Christopher L Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
kdepim now that it uses cdbs and builds static libs takes roughly 3.5x
as long to build and 10x the diskspace. This is too much diskspace in
fact for it to even to build on s390 and if I did my math right will
take somewhere over 200hr to build
* Daniel Schepler [Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:36:14 -0800]:
I don't see what I can really do about this. Dropping the static
libraries entirely would be a policy violation,
FYI, note that both Release Managers agree that not providing static
libraries for kdepim is not grave at all:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:36:14PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Christopher L Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
kdepim now that it uses cdbs and builds static libs takes roughly 3.5x
as long to build and 10x the diskspace. This is too much diskspace in
fact for it to even to build on s390
4 matches
Mail list logo
