Re: Bug#324521: kmail: Bounce should leave original Received: headers

2005-10-28 Thread Frederico Moraes Ferreira
I dont think so. Sometimes the bounce function could be a good excuse instead of simple not answer a e-mail. For exemplo, if your great mather in law invites you for a familiar dinner, I think a bounce mail is gonna be a nice scape. It's time we have the kmail bouce function back! Fred Op maa

Re: Bug#324521: kmail: Bounce should leave original Received: headers

2005-10-28 Thread Frederico Moraes Ferreira
I dont think so. Sometimes the bounce function could be a good excuse instead of simple not answer a e-mail. For exemplo, if your great mather in law invites you for a familiar dinner, I think a bounce mail is gonna be a nice scape. It's time we have the kmail bouce function back! Fred Op maa

Bug#324521: kmail: Bounce should leave original Received: headers

2005-08-22 Thread Tom Albers
Op maandag 22 augustus 2005 17:24, schreef Benoit Panizzon: > I often use the bounce function to forward emails to different systems like > Ticket Tracker. Or even a Spamtrap. The bounce function has been removed from KMail >= 3.4. From that version on there is support for 3rd party spam- and vir

Bug#324521: kmail: Bounce should leave original Received: headers

2005-08-22 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: kmail Version: 4:3.3.2-3 Severity: wishlist Hello I often use the bounce function to forward emails to different systems like Ticket Tracker. Or even a Spamtrap. Now the Spamtrap know my IP which is whitelisted. So I assumed it would just take the following IP from the spamer to add i