reopen 368883
thanks
> * debian/patches/17_alpha_ice.dpatch: new patch from Steve Langasek to
> fix FTBFS on alpha (Closes: #368883)
> (urgency set to high for that fix).
Except that, by adding in the new upstream release at the same time,
qt4-x11 is now hitting the same error in a dif
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tag 368883 + pending
> thanks
>
> Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
>> less than 83 packages.
>>
>> Samuel
>
> that one is quite annoying.
>
> Brian: wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 368883 + pending
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
tag 368883 + pending
thanks
Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
> less than 83 packages.
>
> Samuel
that one is quite annoying.
Brian: will you have time to fix that soon (like in less than a couple
o
Hi,
Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
less than 83 packages.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 368883 patch
thanks
So, having diagnosed that this is an interaction between
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden and referencing inlined methods (bug #369642),
the obvious workaround is to keep the problematic methods from getting
inlined.
The attached patch should do this; unfortunately, I haven't
clone 368883 -1
reassign -1 g++-4.0
severity -1 important
thanks
This ICE also happens with g++-4.1 and gcc-snapshot.
Working on a minimal test case.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the
Le Jeu 25 Mai 2006 22:30, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> Brian Nelson a écrit :
> >Isn't an ICE always a compiler bug?
>
> Yes, I was just asking if it was a new bug or a pre-existing one.
>
> > In any case, nothing in the Qt code
> >changed between -1 and -2, so it's certainly a GCC regression.
>
>
Brian Nelson a écrit :
Isn't an ICE always a compiler bug?
Yes, I was just asking if it was a new bug or a pre-existing one.
In any case, nothing in the Qt code
changed between -1 and -2, so it's certainly a GCC regression.
Thanks for the information...I guess that's bad news. It seems th
Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gcc ICEd when attempting to build qt4-x11 on alpha on 2006-05-14. I
> don't know what's the issue and what could fix. However, 4.1.2-1 built
> and the changes to -2 seem minimal, so it should be easy to check
> whether there was a gcc regression or th
Package: qt4-x11
Version: 4.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
gcc ICEd when attempting to build qt4-x11 on alpha on 2006-05-14. I
don't know what's the issue and what could fix. However, 4.1.2-1 built
and the changes to -2 seem minimal, so it should be easy to che
11 matches
Mail list logo
