Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto:
I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependency of a
code profiling program such as KCachegrind, but hey, that's why I
don't use KDE. :)
I agree... Why programs as KHangMan or KTuberling need KNetAttach?
I don't like this
On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:30:00 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto:
I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependency of a
code profiling program such as KCachegrind, but hey, that's why I
don't use KDE. :)
I agree... Why programs as
Il 17/06/2010 14:09, Sune Vuorela ha scritto:
Just to be sure, you want a 52kb executable split out because you don't want
it around
Mmm... yes :D
For me it's not important the program size, while the cleanness.
--
.' `. | Registered Linux User #443882
|a_a | |
On Thursday, 2010-06-17, Carlo Stemberger wrote:
Il 17/06/2010 14:09, Sune Vuorela ha scritto:
Just to be sure, you want a 52kb executable split out because you don't
want it around
Mmm... yes :D
For me it's not important the program size, while the cleanness.
Just to get this right:
On 06/17/2010 08:09 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:30:00 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto:
I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependency of a
code profiling program such as KCachegrind, but hey, that's why I
don't use
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 17 Birželis 2010 18:31:15 John Lindgren wrote:
On 06/17/2010 08:09 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:30:00 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto:
I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependency of a
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 17 Birželis 2010 14:32:53 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
PS.
I don't like this solution because now a Gnome/XFCE/LXDE/... user can't
use KNetAttach without patching the package.
That's wrong. Executable is simply not in PATH. Use full path to run it. And
your request is
Il 17/06/2010 19:12, Modestas Vainius ha scritto:
That's wrong. Executable is simply not in PATH. Use full path to run it.
but it's not the same... a KDE user can start the program by clicking
the icon; a * user has to type the full path into a terminal. Why this
discrimination?
And
your
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 17 Birželis 2010 20:24:13 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
Il 17/06/2010 19:12, Modestas Vainius ha scritto:
That's wrong. Executable is simply not in PATH. Use full path to run it.
but it's not the same... a KDE user can start the program by clicking
the icon; a * user has
Sorry, I forgot to post a copy to everybody...
Messaggio originale
Oggetto:Re: Bug#582844: unusable KNetAttach launcher
Data: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:51:32 +0200
Mittente: Carlo Stemberger carlo.stember...@gmail.com
A: Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu
Il
On 06/16/2010 08:38 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
...
kdebase-runtime contains stuff that any kde app can expect to have around. So
no.
I have added OnlyShowIn=KDE; to the desktop file, so that it is only shown in
KDE. I will mark this bug as fixed with that upload
That works. I still think
11 matches
Mail list logo
