Bug#639300: please build against unixodbc-dev instead of libiodbc2-dev

2013-01-07 Thread Alban Browaeys
Package: soprano-daemon Followup-For: Bug #639300 Just to tell that unixodbc 2.3.1 has support for driver library name in connection string (though debian ships 2.2.14). Thus if a connection manager is wished and also wished is the ability to provide the library name via connection string it is

Bug#639300: please build against unixodbc-dev instead of libiodbc2-dev

2012-06-01 Thread ciel
Ubuntu already linked soprano against libvirtodbc0 rather than libiodbc2.Since it isn't libodbc1, do you think it is still bad? And why is Steve's patch dirty? Here on Debian wheezy, I needed to fix libmyodbc dependencies using ubuntu package, which is much more dirty since I cannot update soprano

Bug#639300: please build against unixodbc-dev instead of libiodbc2-dev

2012-03-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hey there, This patch to soprano has been included in Ubuntu now for a couple of weeks and nothing's exploded. I see that the KDE transition is also done now. Could this change be included in the Debian package? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS

Bug#639300: please build against unixodbc-dev instead of libiodbc2-dev

2012-03-06 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Hi Steve, to be honest: I did not know that this was even possible. I would gladly apply this to upstream Soprano if you could provide a generic non-Debian specific patch. Also did you test this? Did you run the Virtuoso unit test? Cheers, Sebastian On 03/06/2012 08:47 AM, Steve Langasek

Bug#639300: please build against unixodbc-dev instead of libiodbc2-dev

2012-03-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:47:40AM +0100, Sebastian Trüg wrote: to be honest: I did not know that this was even possible. I would gladly apply this to upstream Soprano if you could provide a generic non-Debian specific patch. I'm not very cmake literate, so I probably won't be able to provide

Bug#639300: please build against unixodbc-dev instead of libiodbc2-dev

2012-03-05 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 639300 patch thanks Dear maintainers, I'm surprised to say that after sitting on this bug for far too long, it turns out that it's trivial to fix. Although it had been reported that soprano would not work with unixodbc, once I actually installed virtuoso, which the soprano test suite

Bug#639300: please build against unixodbc-dev instead of libiodbc2-dev

2012-03-05 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi Steve, (Hi Sebastian, this is a reply of the Debian bug #639300, which is about switching soprano from iODBC to unixODBC; you can find the whole log with the mentioned patch at [1].) [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639300 Alle martedì 6 marzo 2012, Steve Langasek ha