Control: reopen -1
Control: tag -1 - patch
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 07:06:34 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-01 at 17:20:40 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > Further conversation about problems compiling and linking against Qt and
> > GPGME in debian suggest that the problem might
Hi Daniel!
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:20:40PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> gniibe also identified a problem in how Qt reports compilation warnings
> related to the PIE/PIC mismatch. I've tried to address that in the
> following patch to qtbase-opensource-src:
>
> From
Processing control commands:
> unmerge 870383
Bug #870383 [src:gpgme1.0] gpgme1.0: FTBFS on some arches: Qt needs a compile
with -fPIC (PIE is not enough), hardening downgrades to PIE
Bug #879014 [src:gpgme1.0] gpgme1.0: FTBFS on some arches: Qt needs a compile
with -fPIC (PIE is not enough),
Processing control commands:
> unmerge 870383
Bug #870383 [libdpkg-perl] libdpkg-perl: PIE specs files override previous
entries
Ignoring request to unmerge a bug which is not merged with any others.
> reassign 870383 libdpkg-perl
Bug #870383 [libdpkg-perl] libdpkg-perl: PIE specs files override
Control: unmerge 870383
Control: reassign 870383 libdpkg-perl
Control: retitle 870383 libdpkg-perl: PIE specs files override previous entries
Control: reassign 879014 src:qtbase-opensource-src
Control: severity 879014 minor
Control: affects 870383 src:gpgme1.0
Control: affects 879014 src:gpgme1.0
Control: affects 879014 + dpkg src:qtbase-opensource-src
Control: tags 879014 + patch
Hi folks--
Further conversation about problems compiling and linking against Qt and
GPGME in debian suggest that the problem might be related to dpkg's
default spec files, and confused by Qt's compiler
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 13:48, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > PIE implies PIE so (and here is what I miss wrote above) PIE should
> > not be added if PIC was used.
>
> PIC implies PIE ;)
Ha! My IRC alternate nickname should be TypoMan.
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> PIE implies PIE so (and here is what I miss wrote above) PIE should
> not be added if PIC was used.
PIC implies PIE ;)
> Moreover PIC is more suitable for libraries, so it should be the right
> choice here.
The problem is that
Hi again!
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 12:43, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> El lun., 9 mar. 2020 07:44, Thorsten Glaser escribió:
>>
>> # same issue
>> forcemerge 879014 870383
>> retitle 879014 gpgme1.0: FTBFS on some arches: Qt needs a compile with -fPIC
>> (PIE is not
Hi!
El lun., 9 mar. 2020 07:44, Thorsten Glaser escribió:
> # same issue
> forcemerge 879014 870383
> retitle 879014 gpgme1.0: FTBFS on some arches: Qt needs a compile with
> -fPIC (PIE is not enough), hardening downgrades to PIE
> # it still persists
> found 879014 1.13.1-6
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
# same issue
forcemerge 879014 870383
retitle 879014 gpgme1.0: FTBFS on some arches: Qt needs a compile with -fPIC
(PIE is not enough), hardening downgrades to PIE
# it still persists
found 879014 1.13.1-6
thanks
Hi,
> points out the problem: Qt wants to be compiled with -fPIC and sets up
> the
11 matches
Mail list logo