> Hi,
>
> In data venerdì 20 agosto 2021 13:32:08 CEST, Chris Hofstaedtler ha scritto:
> > given we are now in the bookworm cycle - do you think kcoreaddons
> > could remove fam (or replace it with gamin if really needed)?
>
> As I wrote a couple of times in this bug already: #510368 must be fixe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 981515 by 510368
Bug #981515 [src:kcoreaddons] kcoreaddons: please replace fam with gamin
981515 was not blocked by any bugs.
981515 was blocking: 966273
Added blocking bug(s) of 981515: 510368
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
block 981515 by 510368
thanks
Hi,
In data venerdì 20 agosto 2021 13:32:08 CEST, Chris Hofstaedtler ha scritto:
> given we are now in the bookworm cycle - do you think kcoreaddons
> could remove fam (or replace it with gamin if really needed)?
As I wrote a couple of times in this bug already: #51
Hi Pino,
given we are now in the bookworm cycle - do you think kcoreaddons
could remove fam (or replace it with gamin if really needed)?
Do you want a wider audience informed of the change, or would the
change in kcoreaddons be self-contained enough?
Thanks,
Chris
In data venerdì 5 marzo 2021 18:16:18 CET, Glenn Strauss ha scritto:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:12:17PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'd argue that switching the FAM implementation across the
> > distribution _is_ a "transition", and as such it ought to have been
> > requested (i
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:12:17PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Personally, I'd argue that switching the FAM implementation across the
> distribution _is_ a "transition", and as such it ought to have been
> requested (if not even started) two months ago.
In July 2020, #966273 was filed: RFA: fam
Dear Glenn,
In data venerdì 5 marzo 2021 16:41:40 CET, Glenn Strauss ha scritto:
> In #981513, courier changed to use libgamin-dev, so
> kcoreaddons is now the *only* remaining package using FAM.
>
> As such, there is considerably more risk to doing nothing
> than there is to migrating to gamin.
In #981513, courier changed to use libgamin-dev, so
kcoreaddons is now the *only* remaining package using FAM.
As such, there is considerably more risk to doing nothing
than there is to migrating to gamin.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510368
is over 12 years old. It's time t
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:54:58PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Glenn Strauss writes:
>
> > gamin provides libfam0.
> >
> > kcoreaddons should load just fine with libfam0 from gamin.
> >
> > I did the research in #510368 and #966273, reviewing the actual code
> > and confidentally
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:23:44AM +0100, Sune Stolborg Vuorela wrote:
>
> On 3/3/21 8:54 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> >
> > thus FAM covers a use case that gamin does not, and this case is: users
> > who want to receive inotify style events for files that have been
> > remotely created or mod
On 3/3/21 8:54 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
thus FAM covers a use case that gamin does not, and this case is: users
who want to receive inotify style events for files that have been
remotely created or modified on NFS mounts.
Also, IIRC gamin depends on Linux-specific features such as inotif
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:54:58PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> I don't think the removal of FAM is as clear-cut as it has been
> presented to be.
>
> AFAIK the following is still current: Gamin provides "No NFS support
> based on specific RPC and server, instead gamin monitors only the stat
Hi,
Glenn Strauss writes:
> gamin provides libfam0.
>
> kcoreaddons should load just fine with libfam0 from gamin.
>
> I did the research in #510368 and #966273, reviewing the actual code
> and confidentally concluded that FAM can be removed from Bullseye.
>
> The safest choice is to have a sing
gamin provides libfam0.
kcoreaddons should load just fine with libfam0 from gamin.
I did the research in #510368 and #966273, reviewing the actual code
and confidentally concluded that FAM can be removed from Bullseye.
The safest choice is to have a single library (gamin) used in the
distro, rat
* Pino Toscano [210201 00:28]:
> In data lunedì 1 febbraio 2021 00:00:47 CET, Chris Hofstaedtler ha scritto:
> I wouldn't say that gamin is more maintained than FAM:
> - on the upstream side (gnome.org), it was moved the "Archive" section
> of the gnome gitlab
> - during the migration to gitlab,
In data lunedì 1 febbraio 2021 00:00:47 CET, Chris Hofstaedtler ha scritto:
> Source: kcoreaddons
> Version: 5.54.0-1
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> your package currently Depends on libfam0 (fam), which has
> been requested to be removed in #966273. Please switch to gamin
> instead. You can find more
Source: kcoreaddons
Version: 5.54.0-1
Dear Maintainer,
your package currently Depends on libfam0 (fam), which has
been requested to be removed in #966273. Please switch to gamin
instead. You can find more info, and an analysis of what probably
needs to be done for your package in this message fro
17 matches
Mail list logo
