Hi,
For the first time since GCC-5 hit in July, I got brave enough to upgrade my
machine. All looks good except that I lost digikam in the process :-(
I'm a DD and willing to help out with uploads. Where can I start?
The present package is not installable and, judging from the BTS, not
build
On 14/11/2015 18:03, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
So where to start: 4.12, 4.14, or 5.0?
4.x is for QT4, so for kde5, you should use 5.0
Advice appreciated.
Folow the instruction at
https://www.digikam.org/download/GIT
./bootstrap.linux is by far the trickest part as you need a lot of dev
On 14/11/2015 21:44, Eric Valette wrote:
On 14/11/2015 18:03, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
So where to start: 4.12, 4.14, or 5.0?
4.x is for QT4, so for kde5, you should use 5.0
Advice appreciated.
Folow the instruction at
https://www.digikam.org/download/GIT
./bootstrap.linux is by far th
On 11/15/2015 06:25 PM, Eric Valette wrote:
On 14/11/2015 21:44, Eric Valette wrote:
On 14/11/2015 18:03, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
So where to start: 4.12, 4.14, or 5.0?
4.x is for QT4, so for kde5, you should use 5.0
Advice appreciated.
Folow the instruction at
https://www.digikam.org/
On November 14, 2015 11:03:31 AM Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> The present package is not installable and, judging from the BTS, not
> buildable. The last upload is about a year ago, though I see 4.12 in the
> VCS (2 months ago). Upstream released 4.14 a month ago. However it's
> unclear to me whet
On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead and did a
local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine.
What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed on
digikam 5 and the beta2 is already work
On December 15, 2015 01:32:49 PM Eric Valette wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead and did
> > a local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine.
>
> What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpe
On December 15, 2015 7:32:49 AM EST, Eric Valette wrote:
>On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
>> Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead
>and did a
>> local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine.
>
>What's the benefice of taking this path? Deve
>What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed
>on
>digikam 5 and the beta2 is already working fine.
>
>Anyway I do not care as I now have digikam 5.0.0-beta2 working on my
>system...
It would get a working Digikam back, which I think is a great idea.
9 matches
Mail list logo