Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable :-(

2015-11-14 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, For the first time since GCC-5 hit in July, I got brave enough to upgrade my machine. All looks good except that I lost digikam in the process :-( I'm a DD and willing to help out with uploads. Where can I start? The present package is not installable and, judging from the BTS, not build

Re: Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable :-(

2015-11-14 Thread Eric Valette
On 14/11/2015 18:03, Steve M. Robbins wrote: So where to start: 4.12, 4.14, or 5.0? 4.x is for QT4, so for kde5, you should use 5.0 Advice appreciated. Folow the instruction at https://www.digikam.org/download/GIT ./bootstrap.linux is by far the trickest part as you need a lot of dev

Re: Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable :-(

2015-11-15 Thread Eric Valette
On 14/11/2015 21:44, Eric Valette wrote: On 14/11/2015 18:03, Steve M. Robbins wrote: So where to start: 4.12, 4.14, or 5.0? 4.x is for QT4, so for kde5, you should use 5.0 Advice appreciated. Folow the instruction at https://www.digikam.org/download/GIT ./bootstrap.linux is by far th

Re: Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable :-(

2015-11-17 Thread Eric Valette
On 11/15/2015 06:25 PM, Eric Valette wrote: On 14/11/2015 21:44, Eric Valette wrote: On 14/11/2015 18:03, Steve M. Robbins wrote: So where to start: 4.12, 4.14, or 5.0? 4.x is for QT4, so for kde5, you should use 5.0 Advice appreciated. Folow the instruction at https://www.digikam.org/

Re: Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable :-(

2015-12-14 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On November 14, 2015 11:03:31 AM Steve M. Robbins wrote: > The present package is not installable and, judging from the BTS, not > buildable. The last upload is about a year ago, though I see 4.12 in the > VCS (2 months ago). Upstream released 4.14 a month ago. However it's > unclear to me whet

Re: Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable :-(

2015-12-15 Thread Eric Valette
On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead and did a local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine. What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed on digikam 5 and the beta2 is already work

Re: Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable :-(

2015-12-17 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On December 15, 2015 01:32:49 PM Eric Valette wrote: > On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead and did > > a local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine. > > What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpe

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable :-(

2015-12-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 15, 2015 7:32:49 AM EST, Eric Valette wrote: >On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead >and did a >> local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine. > >What's the benefice of taking this path? Deve

Re: Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Just lost my digikam -- no longer installable:-(

2015-12-15 Thread Eric Valette
>What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed >on >digikam 5 and the beta2 is already working fine. > >Anyway I do not care as I now have digikam 5.0.0-beta2 working on my >system... It would get a working Digikam back, which I think is a great idea.