On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:25:58PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:49:16PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
Heh. :)
Thanks for the information, I will reenable it with the next upload.
Chris
FYI, I will also do another upload over the week-end so that lm-sensors
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:24:42AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The lm-sensors mess has been solved by Aurelien Jarno. (Hooray!) The
new version has been arranged to work with both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, with
no crashes or anything.
You can now reenable lm-sensors support if you do it
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:49:16PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:24:42AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The lm-sensors mess has been solved by Aurelien Jarno. (Hooray!) The
new version has been arranged to work with both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, with
no crashes or
The lm-sensors mess has been solved by Aurelien Jarno. (Hooray!) The
new version has been arranged to work with both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, with
no crashes or anything.
You can now reenable lm-sensors support if you do it carefully.
The source package must build-depend on libsensors-dev (=
4 matches
Mail list logo
