Hi. :)
> There have been some setbacks since the last status update. kdetoys had
> an rc bug, so a new version was uploaded and still needs to build on 4
> archs.
FWIW, this wasn't an RC bug (in fact the bug wasn't even in the debian
BTS). It was however a bug that had been annoying me, and
debian-release@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: KDE 3.1.5 Status Update - 20040217
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 05:06:19AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> As for the remaining things to happen before jack-audio-connection-kit
> and als
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:47:22AM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote:
> (Cross posted to debian-kde, as many there are wondering why KDE 3.2
> isn't in unstable yet.)
Here's a follow-up, as some slightly strange things happened in testing
last night which bear explaining.
> Chris hasn't done a status up
Colin Watson wrote:
>There's going to be one problem with these two, namely that they both
>need newer alsa-lib which needs newer jack-audio-connection-kit than
>what's in testing, and some things still need to be rebuilt for that.
Having anticipated that, I worked out an extensive list of the iss
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:36:14AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:55:55PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > kdebase 3.1.5-2
> > ---
> > mipsel - failed - needs retry with unbuilt qt-x11-free (see below)
> > (Feb 4)
> > s390- failed - bad kernel headers? (Feb
> kdegames 3.1.5-1
>
> arm- failed - needs recompile with current g++ (Jan 15)
Looks like this was built again with the same version of gcc
(3.3.3-0pre1) and failed at the same point. It isn't obvious to me from
the build error that this is a g++ problem, but I suppose that if
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:55:55PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Some of the packages were changed to Needs-Build so hopefully they will
> be built soon. Maybe I will be able to upload KDE 3.2.0 by the end of
> the week. :)
[...]
> kdebase 3.1.5-2
> ---
> mipsel- failed - needs retry wit
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:43:26AM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote:
> > If anyone wants to ever see KDE 3.2 get into sid someone will need to
> > persuade the buildd admins to retry the packages below so that KDE
> > 3.1.5 can go into sarge...
> >
> > Chris
>
> Actually, it looks to me like all of these
> If anyone wants to ever see KDE 3.2 get into sid someone will need to
> persuade the buildd admins to retry the packages below so that KDE
> 3.1.5 can go into sarge...
>
> Chris
Actually, it looks to me like all of these packages have been building
since Thursday or Friday. What happened to t
Btw, I think it would be more usefull, if this would be in (rough) depency
order instead of alphabetical.
On Sunday 01 February 2004 10:06, Chris Cheney wrote:
> A few of the packages finally got reset to Needs-Build but there are
> still many more that need to be reset...
The buildd infa appear
On Thursday 29 January 2004 10:33 pm, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> With KDE not even being built on various archs while in sid already,
> what makes you think uploading to experimental will help find bugs on
> other archs? If you didn't know already experimental isn't built by
> buildds at all. And at
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:12:12PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> >And at the current rate that the buildds are retrying
> >KDE 3.1.5 it will be months before it goes into sarge as well.
> The undeniable fact that other parts of the project are making it harder for
> sarge
Chris Cheney wrote:
>And at the current rate that the buildds are retrying
>KDE 3.1.5 it will be months before it goes into sarge as well.
The undeniable fact that other parts of the project are making it harder for
sarge to be release-ready is no reason for you to make it harder for sarge to
be
Josh Metzler wrote:
>I propose that the initial upload of KDE 3.2 be made to experimental rather
>than unstable. Anyonw who is tracking sid ought to be able to figure out how
>to get 3.2 from experimental.
I strongly second this idea. This way, KDE 3.1.5 can get into sarge *while*
KDE 3.2 is
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:04:23PM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote:
> I propose that the initial upload of KDE 3.2 be made to experimental rather
> than unstable. Anyonw who is tracking sid ought to be able to figure out how
> to get 3.2 from experimental. This would allow some initial testing to be
(cross-posted to -devel, as I think people who don't track -qt-kde should be
in on the discussion)
>KDE is still not anywhere near ready to go into sarge. Most of it is
>caused by the buildd admins. You can see the dates of last state change
>on the various packages, many of them have been stuck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:24 pm, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Great, you seem to have fixed the gcj compilation stuff.
Wasn't hard, it basically worked out of the box once the autoconf stuff was
fixed to look for gcj.
> I have been working on kdeb
Peter Hawkins writes:
> Hi...
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 03:26 pm, Chris Cheney wrote:
>> kdebindings --- probably should be packaged sometime... not
>> blocking anything though
> Strange you should mention it. Try:
> http://www.hawkins.emu.id.au/kdebindings-20040121.diff
> (diff against KDE_
> However, I do need to do another upload of kdemultimedia to
> fix the libxine issue with kdeaddons.
Not urgent, since I've just done a new kdeaddons upload with libxine-dev
temporarily added to the build-depends until the issue can be resolved
properly.
Ben.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 03:26 pm, Chris Cheney wrote:
> kdebindings
> ---
> probably should be packaged sometime... not blocking anything though
Strange you should mention it.
Try:
http://www.hawkins.emu.id.au/kdebindings-20040121.diff
(dif
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:19:04PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> qt-x11-free
> ---
> finished
... but has an RC bug due apparently to breakage in libxrender-dev. I've
suggested a binary-only NMU workaround, since the bug appears to have
manifested only on the maintainer's build machine and
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:23:38PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Actually, Ingo Juergensmann is just the local admin of arrakis. He
> doesn't help because he's not a DD, that's all.
That's why you was supposed to do the buildd stuff. I think we're forming a
nice couple in that way... ;))
> Th
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:19:04PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Everything is in sid now, but the buildds FUCKING SUCK! The buildd
> admins must be incompetent or on crack. They failed all the builds that
> failed due to the g++ RC enum bug instead of updating their buildd and
> setting the package
> As far as I can tell the only thing that uses libxine is xine_artsplugin
> which shouldn't be being linked into anything. libxine-dev is already in
> the kdemultimedia Build-Depends due to xine_artsplugin using it.
Nevertheless, having downloaded the alpha noatun package, it seems that
for both
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:14:08PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > kdeaddons
> > -
-snip-
> Of course this is all pure speculation - I haven't actually had a chance
> to downloaded the kdemultimedia sources and take a look.
As far as I can tell the only thing that uses libxine is xine_arts
> kdeaddons
> -
> alpha - failed - libxine missing(?)
> hppa - failed - libxine missing(?)
> mips - failed - libxine missing(?)
> mipsel- failed - libxine missing(?)
> powerpc - failed - libxine missing(?)
> s390 - failed - libxine missing(?)
> sparc - failed - libxine mis
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 06:23:16PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > It looks like everything is at 3.1.5 now except for Ben's packages.
>
> I've just come back from a maths conference, and I haven't been treating
> my modules as particularly urgent since the issues that prompted 3.1.5
> were not in
> It looks like everything is at 3.1.5 now except for Ben's packages.
I've just come back from a maths conference, and I haven't been treating
my modules as particularly urgent since the issues that prompted 3.1.5
were not in my modules, and my modules have already had recent BRANCH
updates anywa
Am Fr, den 16.01.2004 schrieb Chris Cheney um 09:45:
> suppose the other maintainers will be following shortly. I am not sure
> if Ralf is going to be doing the 3.1.5 backport packages or not.
KRalf is still on holidays. He will return in two weeks or so.
--
Noèl Köthe
Debian GNU/Linux, www.de
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 08:21:13PM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> will there be 3.1.5 packages? there have been numerous reports that the 3.1.4
> ones are too old, and apt-get update doesn't work on them (whatasurprise)
All my KDE 3.1.5 packages are already in sid or in the new queue.
Chris Cheney wrote:
>There are currently two known bugs that will block KDE 3.1.5 from going
>into sarge #226727 and #226738. It seems the GCC people don't think
>their bug is important enough to fix...
More, that it wasn't diagnosed enough to fix in a reasonable amount of
time. :-( But kdelibs
Am Do, den 15.01.2004 schrieb Chris Cheney um 04:00:
> kdegames
>
> not uploaded yet
is in incoming
> kde-i18n
>
> not uploaded yet
uploaded and is in incoming
> qt-x11-free
> ---
> m68k - not uploaded yet
is in incoming
--
Noèl Köthe
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:39:12PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> >kdelibs
> >---
> >m68k - failed - needs retry (waiting on qt-x11-free)
> >mips - failed - ICE #226727
>
> Please try to find a workaround for this ICE (or help find & fix it).
This appears to be moot, k
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:39:12PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> >kdelibs
> >---
> >m68k - failed - needs retry (waiting on qt-x11-free)
> >mips - failed - ICE #226727
>
> Please try to find a workaround for this ICE (or help find & fix it).
> The GCC developers haven'
Chris Cheney wrote:
kdelibs
---
m68k- failed - needs retry (waiting on qt-x11-free)
mips- failed - ICE #226727
Please try to find a workaround for this ICE (or help find & fix it).
The GCC developers haven't tracked it down yet, which means it may well
not be fixed by sarge release
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:42:00AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:32AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> > >
> > > > kdeaddons
> > > > -
> > > > wait to upload until all else is finished
> > >
> > > FWIW, this is somewhat too great a
Hi,
Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:32AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> >
> > > kdeaddons
> > > -
> > > wait to upload until all else is finished
> >
> > FWIW, this is somewhat too great a restriction.
> > The kdeaddons module build-depends on kdebase,
> > kdemultimedia a
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:32AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > kdeaddons
> > -
> > wait to upload until all else is finished
>
> FWIW, this is somewhat too great a restriction.
> The kdeaddons module build-depends on kdebase,
> kdemultimedia and kdegames, but IIRC nothing else.
You kn
> kdeaddons
> -
> wait to upload until all else is finished
FWIW, this is somewhat too great a restriction.
The kdeaddons module build-depends on kdebase,
kdemultimedia and kdegames, but IIRC nothing else.
(As an aside, I would actually expect kdeaddons 3.1.5 to
build just fine against K
39 matches
Mail list logo
