getfem++_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Xavier, so unfortunately, this reject will be more work: - there seem to be more copyrights in superlu, e.g. LAPACK stuff from the U of Tennessee. Even if it doesn't have a copyright notice in those files, it seems to me that the LAPACK providence indicates that they own the

getfem++_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Xavier, unfortunately, I seem to be unable to find the Build-Depends: ..., automake1.10, ... this makes it a reject. On a minor note: It seems odd that QT/KDE maintainers maintain a FEM package. Did you try to talk to the Debian Scientific Computing Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Kind regards

Re: getfem++_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hello unfortunately, I seem to be unable to find the Build-Depends:..., automake1.10, ... this makes it a reject. automake1.10 is a virtual package provided by automake (=1:1.10) Is it forbidden to depend on virtual packages ? On a minor note: It seems odd that QT/KDE maintainers

Re: getfem++_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, Xavier Vello wrote: unfortunately, I seem to be unable to find the Build-Depends: ..., automake1.10, ... this makes it a reject. automake1.10 is a virtual package provided by automake (=1:1.10) Is it forbidden to depend on virtual packages ? My mistake, apologies. While purely