> > one thing I forgot in my last mail - is the c102 stings in the
> > packages still required or is the gcc transition over so those can
> > be removed safely now and go back to the original package names ?
> >
> AIUI it will be needed until the soname is changed, i.e. Qt 4.0
This is correct.
On Aug 31, 2003 at 11:36, Ralf Nolden praised the llamas by saying:
Content-Description: signed data
> Hi,
>
> one thing I forgot in my last mail - is the c102 stings in the packages still
> required or is the gcc transition over so those can be removed safely now and
> go back to the original p
Hi,
one thing I forgot in my last mail - is the c102 stings in the packages still
required or is the gcc transition over so those can be removed safely now and
go back to the original package names ?
Ralf
--
We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs.
--
3 matches
Mail list logo