Subject: RFS: ruby-fog-sakuracloud

2014-11-10 Thread Rejah Rehim
Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-fog-sakuracloud. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I have tried running tests but it fails. As my membership request to alioth is still pending, I've added my package to the following git-repo:

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2014-11-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Friday 07 November 2014 07:46 PM, Balasankar C wrote: Updated the git repo for this package with modifications suggested by Cédric Boutillier on another package (ruby-version-sorter). The changes are * Starting short description with lowercase letter * Changing Testsuite to

Re: RFS: ruby-version-sorter

2014-11-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Monday 03 November 2014 07:42 PM, Balasankar C wrote: The file ext/version_sorter/frameworks/cmockery.framework/Versions/A/cmokery is a binary file, and is certainly not in its preferred form of modification. The directory ext/version_sorter/frameworks is used only when the preprocessor

Re: Subject: RFS: ruby-fog-sakuracloud

2014-11-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Monday 10 November 2014 03:51 PM, Rejah Rehim wrote: Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-fog-sakuracloud. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I have tried running tests but it fails. As my membership request to alioth is still pending, I've added my package to the following

Re: Subject: RFS: ruby-fog-sakuracloud

2014-11-10 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi Rejah, I've just added you to the team on Alioth. Welcome in the Ruby team. Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#769049: unblock: ruby-elasticsearch/1.0.5-1

2014-11-10 Thread Tim Potter
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ruby-elasticsearch. This package has a RC bug (#768613) filed against it due to a dependency that is not currently in testing. The dependency is for an optional

Re: Fixing broken (non-)dependency for ruby-elasticsearch

2014-11-10 Thread Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)
On 6/11/14 11:34 PM, Cédric Boutillier bou...@debian.org wrote: You can try to approach the release team and ask their opinion about this package that was prevented to enter testing because of a buggy build-dependency that was used only to run some (minor?) tests. Hi Cedric. Thanks for the