Re: Request for upload rights: ruby-crb-blast and others

* Michael Crusoe [160305 20:51]: > I recently gained Debian Maintainer status > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810791 > > Could I have upload privileges for the following packages? > ruby-colorize > ruby-crb-blast > ruby-facade >

Re: RFS: ruby-amq-protocol

* Lucas Kanashiro [160312 17:10]: > Since Sebastien already committed ruby-amqp depending on new version of > ruby-amq-protocol, I think that this version of rubu-amq-protocol can be > uploaded :) Uploaded, thanks. Sébastien: uploaded your changes to ruby-amqp as

Re: ruby2.2: Contains file released under a nonfree license

Francesco, Thank you for caring about this issue. I'd welcome your help in the upstream bug at https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11844 A text patch explaining the current state for the d/copyright file in ruby2.3 would also be very welcome. Best, -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler

Re: RFS ruby-commander

* Lucas Moura [160311 01:24]: > I have installed rhc and executed a few of its commands in order to see if > ithe application is running properly. As far as I can tell, I have not > encountered any errors while using the package. Considering that > ruby-commander is used

Re: RFS: ruby-akismet

* Sagar Ippalpalli [160310 13:24]: > Hi, > > I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem akismet. The package > was tested on pbuilder and was successfully built. It is also > lintian-clean. I've uploaded the package to the alioth repo which may be > found at >

Re: librarian-puppet

* Michael Moll [160311 23:59]: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:32:11PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > Please check if my change is useful and if so, what needs to be done > > regarding puppet_forge. > > I just pushed a patch which fixes the puppet_forge

Re: ruby-hoe 3.14.2

* Lucas Moura [160312 19:19]: > Hi, > > The following package is ready to be uploaded. Although it currently has > the following > lintian warnings related to its rdoc documentation: > > * package-contains-timestamped-gzip > * duplicated-compressed-file > > Could you

Re: ruby2.3 as default in experimental - please help testing

On Sunday 13 March 2016 11:53 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > But I found issues with diaspora-installer and reported it as #818054 I uploaded another revision of diaspora to test ruby 2.3 and it is installing and starting fine. I found #818073, though this could be unrelated to ruby 2.3. I'm running