Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/19/16, Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote: > > Its pushed to alioth. Can someone check? > > > > Error below: > > > > $ clean > > dh clean --buildsystem=ruby --with ruby,systemd > > dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=ruby > > dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=ruby > > dh_ruby --clean > > dh_ruby --clean > > VERSION= must be specified > > dh_auto_clean: dh_ruby --clean returned exit code 1 > > debian/rules:6: recipe for target 'clean' failed > > make: *** [clean] Error 1 > > This is not the only problem, then you should have olddoc gem, I > remember that I tried to fix these error, but I don't see my changes, > maybe I did this on my home pc, I'll look there.
(oops, missed this earlier) I understand olddoc may not be worth the effort to package in Debian. (I already tried to reduce dependencies in olddoc compared to wrongdoc, but a package is a package...) Anyways, I suggest you guys grab the generated gemspec from the Rubygem or tar.gz. You already seem to be doing that with NEWS and the manpages to avoid a build-dep on pandoc(*). Maybe the gemspec in git could have olddoc become optional, too, while still remaining DRY. The email address for the public mailing list is already specified in multiple places, so maybe over-DRY-ing isn't worth it... Anyways, feel free to email me + Cc: unicorn-pub...@bogomips.org w.r.t. any packaging/integration issues for any Free Software systems (not just Debian) (*) - I'll be switching over to perlpod at some point and pod2man is standard in Debian. I hate having to spend ~30MB of bandwidth fees to get ghc + pandoc to build manpages.