Re: RFS: tdiary-style-rd, tdiary-style-gfm

2016-11-22 Thread dai
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 07:19:07PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > * tdiary-style-rd: RD Style for tDiary >- ITP: #828221 FTBFS by pbuilder: - rake aborted! LoadError: cannot load such file -- rspec/core/rake_task - maybe lack of Build-Depends. > * tdiary-style-gfm: GFM style for tD

Re: RFS: tdiary-style-rd, tdiary-style-gfm

2016-11-22 Thread Youhei SASAKI
Hi, On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:17:58 +0900, d...@debian.org wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 07:19:07PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > > * tdiary-style-rd: RD Style for tDiary > >- ITP: #828221 > > FTBFS by pbuilder: > > - > rake aborted! > LoadError: cannot load such file -- rspec/core/r

Re: RFS: tdiary-style-rd, tdiary-style-gfm

2016-11-22 Thread dai
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 06:45:39PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > Hmm... I cant reproduce this FTBSF in my sbuild environments. > > The "ruby-rspec" is already in Build-Depends. I recommenced to pull and confirmed that B-D had ruby-rspec. built successfully, but some must-fix-issue is in d/control

ruby-mail-gpg: Questions regarding 'dpkg-source: Local changes detected' and debian/control

2016-11-22 Thread ge...@riseup.net
Hi all, After quite some time, I was finally able to work again on the package, and I've got some questions: - I'm not sure why, but I guess when I've imported 0.2.9 into git, I forgot to do 'git push --all', instead I did 'git push', if I remember correctly. If I'm now building the packag

Re: ruby-mail-gpg: Questions regarding 'dpkg-source: Local changes detected' and debian/control

2016-11-22 Thread ge...@riseup.net
Hi, On 16-11-22 19:04:02, ge...@riseup.net wrote: > - I'm not sure why, but I guess when I've imported 0.2.9 into git, I > forgot to do 'git push --all', instead I did 'git push', if I remember > correctly. > > If I'm now building the package, I get: > dpkg-source: info: local changes det

RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.9-1

2016-11-22 Thread ge...@riseup.net
Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.9-1 I've tested the package with lintian and piuparts, both pass. Additionally, I've enabled autopkgtest, the upstream provided tests work, and it builds fine in a chroot. Right now I'm not sure if debian/control is correct