Hi,
Can someone review the patch? I noticed the version selected is 0.33.1
instead of expected 1.0.0. Can someone confirm if the gemspec is really
invalid (as reported by gem2deb #866198)?
Thanks
Praveen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:40:14PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, the template copyright file that is generated by gem2deb uses
> GPL-2.0+ as a placeholder license. Since a majority of the Ruby gems are
> under MIT/Expat license, can we use that instead? I had opened a bug[0]
On 06/28/2017 12:40 PM, Balasankar C wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, the template copyright file that is generated by gem2deb uses
> GPL-2.0+ as a placeholder license. Since a majority of the Ruby gems are
> under MIT/Expat license, can we use that instead? I had opened a bug[0]
> long back about
Hi all,
Currently, the template copyright file that is generated by gem2deb uses
GPL-2.0+ as a placeholder license. Since a majority of the Ruby gems are
under MIT/Expat license, can we use that instead? I had opened a bug[0]
long back about it, but had forgotten about that. I understand using
4 matches
Mail list logo