Re: RFS: ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1

Hi, On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 06:23:16AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > > > * /usr/share/doc/ruby-sequel/doc/release_notes/*.txt > > > > > Somehow they are compressed or uncompressed. > Not sure what to do about this, though.. is this blocking upload? i think it (and application-in-library-se

Re: Switching to gitlab-grit fork for ruby-grit

On വെള്ളി 16 മാർച്ച് 2018 05:01 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > grit is dead upstream and I think it makes sense to use gitlab-grit > tarballs directly than maintaining a patch. > > Only ruby-gitlab-flowdock-git-hook depends on ruby-grit (this switch > will allow us to remove a patch as wel

Re: RFS: ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1

Hi dai, On 18-03-18 05:59:05, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 18-03-18 13:43:51, d...@debian.org wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 05:30:37AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > > * /usr/share/doc/ruby-sequel/doc/release_notes/*.txt > > > > Somehow they are compressed or uncompressed. > > > > > > I do

Re: RFS: ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1

hi dai, On 18-03-18 13:43:51, d...@debian.org wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 05:30:37AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > * /usr/share/doc/ruby-sequel/doc/release_notes/*.txt > > > Somehow they are compressed or uncompressed. > > > > I don't understand this. Is this a lintian error? If so, I

Re: RFS: ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1

Hi, On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 05:30:37AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > * /usr/share/doc/ruby-sequel/doc/release_notes/*.txt > > Somehow they are compressed or uncompressed. > > I don't understand this. Is this a lintian error? If so, I can't see > this if running lintian locally. Also, I had a

Re: RFS: ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1

Hi dai, Thanks for your review: On 18-03-18 13:13:03, d...@debian.org wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 02:14:30PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > Please review and sponsor ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1, find the changes in > > branch debian/5.6.0-1. > > I built and check it: > > * /usr/share/doc/ruby-seq

Re: RFS: ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1

Hi, On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 02:14:30PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > Please review and sponsor ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1, find the changes in > branch debian/5.6.0-1. I built and check it: * /usr/share/doc/ruby-sequel/doc/release_notes/*.txt Somehow they are compressed or uncompressed. * I: ruby-seq

Re: orphaned and to be removed packages

On ശനി 17 മാർച്ച് 2018 07:26 വൈകു, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > * ruby-little-plugger (ruby-logging) > * ruby-logging (ruby-googleauth, ruby-logging-rail) I need these two for gitlab so I'll take care of them. Added myself as uploader for both. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

orphaned and to be removed packages

Hi team! A few years ago I've prepared several packages required to run berkshelf-api, a build dependency for berkshelf. Now berkshelf-api is deprecated, so I'm going to request its removal from Debian. As a preparation for this step I removed myself from uploaders from certain packages: * ruby-f

RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

Hi team! I've prepared new version for the following packages: * just a new minor version + vcs-* updated: - ruby-tzinfo - ruby-gettext - ruby-kgio * a new major version + d/control changes to prevent broken ruby-dep-selector installation - ruby-solve Please review and upload them

RFS: ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1

Hi all, Please review and sponsor ruby-sequel 5.6.0-1, find the changes in branch debian/5.6.0-1. Note: Lintian complains about application-in-library-section ruby usr/bin/sequel. I didn't touched this yet, but: Should this package be renamed in a upload in the future? Thanks in advance, cheers,