On 2018, ഡിസംബർ 19 5:54:00 AM IST, Georg Faerber wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 18-12-18 17:05:18, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> This is probably a transient failure. I'm not able to reproduce it
>> today.
>
>Did you check one of the two mentioned packages? I'm still running into
>this error.
Yes, I checked
Hi,
On 18-12-18 17:05:18, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> This is probably a transient failure. I'm not able to reproduce it
> today.
Did you check one of the two mentioned packages? I'm still running into
this error.
Cheers,
Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem raabro. The
package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also
lintian-clean. I'veuploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be
found at
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-raabro/
This was an unpackaged gem for
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> On 12/18/18 5:55 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Thank you for reviewing.
> > I have fixed both the issues in the latest commit.
> >
> > Please look at the same and let me know if there's anything that needs
> > to be
On 12/18/18 6:10 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Done and updated. Sorry for the trouble!
> Please let me know if there's still an issue regarding the same.
Uploaded, thanks for your contributions.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:40 PM Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> On 12/17/18 10:45 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem snorlax. The package was
> > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean.
> I've
> > uploaded the package
On 12/18/18 5:55 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Thank you for reviewing.
> I have fixed both the issues in the latest commit.
>
> Please look at the same and let me know if there's anything that needs
> to be fixed/edited.
The short description and long description should be kept separate.
On 8/23/18 12:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> Rails 5 is in experimental and we need to complete compatibility check
> of all reverse dependencies before it can be in unstable.
>
> We have started a wiki page to track progress,
>
>
Hi,
The following packages were initially packaged for gitlab, but from
11.4.9, gitlab does not require it. I'm going to file removal requests
for them if no one is interested to keep them. There are no reverse
dependencies.
ruby-sidekiq-limit-fetch
ruby-peek-sidekiq
ruby-dropzonejs-rails
On 12/17/18 12:02 AM, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today I've worked on two packages, ruby-gpgme and ruby-sequel, and ran into
> the
> following error for both of them during autopkgtest:
>
> Checking Rubygems dependency resolution on ruby2.5 │
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
