Re: The state of the art with the current ruby-aws-sdk packaging versions (was ruby-aws-sdk_2.11.422-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2020-01-15 Thread David Suarez
El mié., 15 ene. 2020 21:33, Utkarsh Gupta escribió: > Hiya, > > On 13/01/20 12:00 am, David Suárez wrote: > > From my point of view packaging all the v3 gems could not be lot's of > > work, if we use the multi binary layout that gem2deb provides. > > The question is, is that worth the effort? >

Re: The state of the art with the current ruby-aws-sdk packaging versions (was ruby-aws-sdk_2.11.422-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2020-01-15 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hiya, On 13/01/20 12:00 am, David Suárez wrote: > From my point of view packaging all the v3 gems could not be lot's of > work, if we use the multi binary layout that gem2deb provides. The question is, is that worth the effort? What would we want that for? Is there any need per se? > Renaming th

Re: Ruby team sprint -- accomodation etc.

2020-01-15 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Georg, On 13/01/20 3:14 am, Georg Faerber wrote: > Any further recommendation regarding hosting? Should we indeed organize > for ourselves? Mostly everyone has booked. Probably you should do the same and get the accommodation sorted asap, that is, before the prices rise any further. P.S. 6 of

Re: ruby-redis 4.0 transition - help needed

2020-01-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാ, Nov 21, 2019 at 15:10, Pirate Praveen wrote: On വ്യാ, Nov 21, 2019 at 15:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: On വ്യാ, Nov 21, 2019 at 14:50, Pirate Praveen  wrote: Hi team, Needs help with ruby-fakeredis. For ruby-mail-room and ruby-redis-namespace I will try if new upstreams f

Major gem package versions [Was: Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk]

2020-01-15 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
On 08/01/2020 10:20, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ബു, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:00, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote: >> On 07/01/2020 20:49, Pirate Praveen wrote: >>> >>> >>>  On ബു, Jan 8, 2020 at 01:16, Pirate Praveen >>>  wrote:  ruby-aws-sdk 2 -> 3 is huge change. >>> >>>  It adds 220 new dependencies fo