On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:24 PM Georg Faerber wrote:
> Works for me (using 0.45), if it doesn't for you, we should investigate,
> maybe there is a bug lurking, somewhere.
I am using the latest version. 1.0.4.
Maybe this should help us now \o/
Best,
Utkarsh
On 20-02-11 19:12:45, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> When packaging a new gem, using gem2deb doesn't create a
> debian/salsa-ci.yml file.
> For instance, gem2deb dry-types. This will not yield a salsa-ci.yml
> file, whilst it should.
Works for me (using 0.45), if it doesn't for you, we should investigate,
Hi Marc,
you worked on redmine. It seems the patch for redmine to increase the allowed
i18n version is maybe too strict. Is there a reason to depend on i18n ~>1.5.3
instead of "just" ~>1.5? The current version of ruby-i18n in unstable is 1.8.2
atm.
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/
Hi Georg,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:10 PM Georg Faerber wrote:
> > JFTR: It is also missing debian/.gitattributes - probably for the same
> > reason.
>
> I just did a test: debian/salsa-ci.yml is created correctly, but
> debian/.gitattributes is not. I guess the current code doesn't handle
> file
Hi Georg,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:41 PM Georg Faerber wrote:
> > Whilst there's debian/salsa-ci.yml in the template, it still doesn't
> > seem to work.
> > It didn't work for me either. And Antonio is aware of this.
>
> I'm not aware, mind to elaborate? What does not work, specifically?
When p
Hi,
On 20-02-12 00:50:58, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> JFTR: It is also missing debian/.gitattributes - probably for the same
> reason.
I just did a test: debian/salsa-ci.yml is created correctly, but
debian/.gitattributes is not. I guess the current code doesn't handle
files with a dot in the beginni
Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2020, 23:42 + schrieb Georg Faerber:
> On 20-02-12 00:29:55, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > can we file RM requests for coquelicot and its reverse dependencies
> > like ruby- haml-magic-translations? Both are dead upstream and have RC
> > bugs. ruby-haml- magic-translations fu
Am Mittwoch, den 12.02.2020, 05:04 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta:
> Hiya,
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:51 AM Georg Faerber wrote:
> > Another note: Both (and ruby-tty-spinner) lacked debian/salsa-ci.yml.
> > That is fixed now.
> >
> > Did you create all of them with the help of gem2deb?
>
> Whil
Hi,
On 20-02-12 00:29:55, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> can we file RM requests for coquelicot and its reverse dependencies
> like ruby- haml-magic-translations? Both are dead upstream and have RC
> bugs. ruby-haml- magic-translations further (build-)depends on a
> non-available ruby-haml version and is
On 20-02-12 05:04:53, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Whilst there's debian/salsa-ci.yml in the template, it still doesn't
> seem to work.
> It didn't work for me either. And Antonio is aware of this.
I'm not aware, mind to elaborate? What does not work, specifically?
Hi all,
can we file RM requests for coquelicot and its reverse dependencies like ruby-
haml-magic-translations? Both are dead upstream and have RC bugs. ruby-haml-
magic-translations further (build-)depends on a non-available ruby-haml version
and is not trivial to fix to work with ruby-haml 5 (I
Hiya,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:51 AM Georg Faerber wrote:
> Another note: Both (and ruby-tty-spinner) lacked debian/salsa-ci.yml.
> That is fixed now.
>
> Did you create all of them with the help of gem2deb?
Whilst there's debian/salsa-ci.yml in the template, it still doesn't
seem to work.
It d
Hi,
Another note: Both (and ruby-tty-spinner) lacked debian/salsa-ci.yml.
That is fixed now.
Did you create all of them with the help of gem2deb?
Cheers,
Georg
Hi,
On 20-02-10 22:01:35, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> I've pushed a bit more in my packaging work (and comprehension, thanks
> all for the help on the IRC channel!) and I now have two more packages
> that are ready: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer.
>
> Can someone please review my work in the salsa
Hi,
On 20-02-10 16:41:12, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> ah! nice thanks for catching those. I've sent corrections to both
> repos.
Thanks for your work; ruby-tty-cursor was uploaded by Sebastien,
ruby-tty-spinner by me.
> I'm not sure that I know what this means. Just to confirm whether my
> understan
Hi all,
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 7:54 PM Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 10.02.2020, 01:13 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
> [..]
> > Add ruby-dep-selector to the list. RC-buggy and no reverse dependencies
> > except as berkshelf's build-dep.
>
> and ruby-grape-msgpack.
The following RM bugs
Hi Christopher,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:39 AM Christopher Huhn wrote:
> Given we discussed about the condition of chef during the sprints (the
> > "crazy" renaming of licensing + can be replaced with "tinc"), is it a
> > good idea (and time) to file an RM bug for it?
>
> I'd have strong wis
Hi Sruthi,
> Accepted:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Format: 1.8
> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 11:55:23 +0100
> Source: rails
> Architecture: source
> Version: 2:5.2.3+dfsg-2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
> Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers lists.aliot
Dear Debian Ruby Maintainers,
> Given we discussed about the condition of chef during the sprints (the
> "crazy" renaming of licensing + can be replaced with "tinc"), is it a
> good idea (and time) to file an RM bug for it?
I'd have strong wish to keep the chef-client as an official Debian
pack
19 matches
Mail list logo
