Re: RFH: testing Rails 6 reverse dependencies

On 2020, മേയ് 9 10:20:03 AM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote: >For packages listed under, > >Ready in unstable (need confirmation, dependency is not strict) (many packages >have no tests) Here is a list of packages that fail autopkgtest,

Re: RFH: testing Rails 6 reverse dependencies

On 2020, മേയ് 9 10:15:36 AM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > >On 2020, മേയ് 9 3:09:54 AM IST, Georg Faerber wrote: >>Hi, >> >>On 20-05-09 00:02:06, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> Please help us in getting Rails 6 to Sid & Bullseye, too :) >>> >>> If you have any questions, please

Re: RFH: testing Rails 6 reverse dependencies

On 2020, മേയ് 9 3:09:54 AM IST, Georg Faerber wrote: >Hi, > >On 20-05-09 00:02:06, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >> [...] >> >> Please help us in getting Rails 6 to Sid & Bullseye, too :) >> >> If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask them here or >> on IRC. > >I'm wondering how the

Re: RFH: testing Rails 6 reverse dependencies

Hi, On 20-05-09 00:02:06, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > [...] > > Please help us in getting Rails 6 to Sid & Bullseye, too :) > > If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask them here or > on IRC. I'm wondering how the help should look like, in detail.. that is: as far as I'm not mistaken,

Teams/Ruby/IRCMeetings wiki page revived and updated!

Hi all, I finally revived and updated our Teams/Ruby/IRCMeetings wiki page. It now has: - details of the meeting (when, where, how). - agenda of the upcoming meeting. - logs of the previously hosted meeting. Hope this looks nice and fresh. Feel free to add other details as you see fit :)

Re: Ruby Team BoF in DC20?

Hi Utkarsh, On 08/05/2020 15:02, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > I still haven't proposed a BoF for DC20 yet mostly because: > a) Not sure if DC20 will still happen or not!? > b) I am not sure if my parents are going to let me go :/ > > Should I still propose a BoF anyway? Personally I don't see a

Ruby 2.7 blog post

Hi team! In our today team meeting [1] we decided to write a blog post about Ruby 2.7 since its transition is now done \o/. It will be good not just to announce the cool features we are delivering to our users but also give visibility to our work within the community. The idea is to talk a bit

RFH: testing Rails 6 reverse dependencies

Hi all, We had a discussion about Rails 6 transition during the meeting today. Whilst the status is temporarily blocked, it was bought up that the testing of reverse dependencies is yet to be done. Given that the number of reverse-(build-)dependencies are huge, it would be nice to have some help

Policy to update packages with API breaking changes

Hi team! In our today team meeting [1] we decided to make public our new policy to update packages with API breaking changes. First of all, I'd like to thank Praveen for the proposal. For quite some time we have been facing issues with packages being uploaded with API breaking changes without

Re: reducing volument of KGB notifications on IRC

Hiya, > As per discussion on IRC, this is now live: KGB notifications for > commits and CI pipeline stati are now send to #debian-ruby-changes. I just added the details about #debian-ruby-changes channel to our Ruby team wiki page :) Best, Utkarsh

MOM of (third) Ruby team meeting

Hi everyone, Thank you to everyone who joined! And to those who couldn't, we look forward to seeing you in the next one! :) We had a pretty nice (& a quick) meeting. Here are the logs: Minutes: http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ruby/2020/debian-ruby.2020-05-08-16.53.html Minutes (text):

Re: Ruby Team BoF in DC20?

Hi all, On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:19 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > I hope to be around there and willing to facilitate the same. > Would people be interested? Remotely or otherwise? > > Given that we have CfP for DC20 open, I'd be happy to propose this if > we have a mutual consent over it. I still