Re: RFS:- ruby-batch-loader newer upstream version

Hey Manas, On 7/18/19 5:47 PM, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Hi, > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded  > Could you please sponsor them? > > ruby-batch-loader newer upstream version to > experimental https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-batch-loader/ > The package was tested on both

Re: RFS: ruby-gravtastic

Hi, On 7/7/19 9:12 PM, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Hi, > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded  > Could you please sponsor them? > > ruby-gravtastic to > unstable https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gravtastic  > > The package was tested on both gbp and sbuild. They're also

Re: migrating gemwatch off alioth

during the Curitiba MiniDebconf this > week, unless someone tells me there is something broken. > Randomly tested with a few packages I maintain and didn't see anything broken. Regards Balasankar C

Re: build failing with sbuild for ruby-flipper

e. However, I now confirm the build fails and this is a valid issue. Regards Balasankar C signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: salsa.d.o: Enabling CI / shared runners by default

Hi, On 02/13/2018 03:40 PM, Balasankar C wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/13/2018 03:05 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> >>> On 13.02.2018, at 06:25, Georg Faerber <ge...@riseup.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've pushed a

Re: salsa.d.o: Enabling CI / shared runners by default

i.yml along with other source files (What if upstream already uses GitLab CI/CD and has a config file of their own)? [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/diaspora-installer/blob/master/debian/.gitlab-ci.yml Regards Balasankar C Debian Developer / Jr. Build Engineer at GitLab signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Use MIT license in gem2deb copyright template

Hi, On Wednesday 28 June 2017 06:43 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:40:14PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: Hi all, Currently, the template copyright file that is generated by gem2deb uses GPL-2.0+ as a placeholder license. Since a majority of the Ruby gems are under MIT

Description of gitlab package

will change the package description to reflect this information. -- Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: ghi: please review (new package, CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker)

On 27 April 2016 6:16:56 pm IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >by your line of thinking we would be splitting every single application >in 2 packages (foo and ruby-foo, foo and python-foo, foo and >libfoo-perl), because every reasonably engineered application has >library code.

Re: Expanding Documentation - Debian Ruby wiki page

On ശനി 12 മാര്‍ച്ച് 2016 12:41 വൈകു, Balasankar C wrote: > On ശനി 05 മാര്‍ച്ച് 2016 09:04 വൈകു, Balasankar C wrote: >> Suggestions/criticisms/factual corrections are welcome. > Anything people? Or can we use move this to the official Ruby namespace in > wiki? Routine reminder

Re: Expanding Documentation - Debian Ruby wiki page

On ശനി 05 മാര്‍ച്ച് 2016 09:04 വൈകു, Balasankar C wrote: > Suggestions/criticisms/factual corrections are welcome. Anything people? Or can we use move this to the official Ruby namespace in wiki? -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: Expanding Documentation - Debian Ruby wiki page

to split the packaging steps to different pages, as single page style seems to cause too much clutter. Suggestions/criticisms/factual corrections are welcome. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJW2vxxAAoJEJbtq5s

Re: [PATCH 0/2] rethinking the contents of pkg-ruby-extras.git

while building, but are not ready to commit until we are sure those changes worked. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: [PATCH 0/2] rethinking the contents of pkg-ruby-extras.git

way. 2. build script uses gbp buildpackage which requires the changes to be commited before building. But, isn't the common workflow make changes => check if it works by doing a build => commit changes ? It saves from amending the comments often. Is there any way to overcome this? - -- Regards

Expanding Documentation - Debian Ruby wiki page

Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJW1sSGAAoJEJbtq5sua3FxygAIAKny1h+EHgvVf5eMi7YNNFJr pW6CUmxFcHNGGHhy/NuCZjPN5b7yPpnPggtFeef/i4cHlp4l6WcAJGOTz5MgX6HQ HhcBftuvqKTqL6JsxtI6QHgkmTqWWM9OhMSyWtSvfG461LqWPXouC5CMPXjyYrx7 MYNxxiWrI1xxfEl1yJCOK

RFS: ruby-github-linguist [Bugfix: #815908]

Hi, I've pushed a new Debian revision to the package ruby-github-linguist which will close the RC bug #815908. I changed the binary renaming logic a bit. Please review and upload. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: RFS: ruby-diaspora-vines

stence of another cert directory for diaspora, and whether it could be shared with this package also. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Diaspora/Packaging/quilt - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWvXZvAAoJEJbtq5sua3Fx0iUH/R

Re: Sponsor-/Mentorship requested: Making "Sonic Pi" ready for Debian

On തിങ്കള്‍ 08 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2016 08:31 വൈകു, Hanno Zulla wrote: > Thanks, it was a great help. My pleasure. :) -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: gem2deb: installing packages with the same layout as Rubygems

1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810518 -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

RFS: ruby-virtus [Bugfix: #804224]

Hi, I've pushed a new revision to ruby-virtus that fixes the RC bug #804224. I applied a patch from upstream that makes the tests run fine. Please review and upload. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: gem2deb: installing packages with the same layout as Rubygems

nd upstream, making it a lot easier for us, and make > everything work better together. I think that at some point this should > become the default, if not for all, at least for new packages. > > I am looking forward to read your ideas about it. > I see gem2deb being pushed to unstable. So, is using the same layout as Rubygems ok? Or, is it not yet official? -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: gitlab and debconf: help needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 This issue has been fixed. Two echo statements (for verbosity) used before loading confmodule caused the issue. Removed them and debconf is no longer an issue. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

Re: Sponsor-/Mentorship requested: Making "Sonic Pi" ready for Debian

On 15 January 2016 7:04:03 pm IST, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >This was a very good overview. Thank you very much for prividing it. >Is it updated automatically? I am running a daily cron job. >Would it be possible to adjust the web page to add a link to the >detected WNPP

Re: Sponsor-/Mentorship requested: Making "Sonic Pi" ready for Debian

Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

RFS: ruby-factory-girl [Bugfix: #808448]

Hi, I've pushed a new revision of ruby-factory-girl to the alioth repo which closes RC bug #808448 . The tests had an incorrect equality matcher, which has been patched. Please upload. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

RFS: ruby-sham-rack [Bugfix: #795609]

. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWkhjPAAoJEJbtq5sua3FxzRMIAJ5NuF9XgJkRnIMmjbB5FVAw 46BO9rTXotQBqIk3PvK1A+uAhowGlbKrzVwpeEga3ekNpX8M4YqPXdYdbvVSpkWD gk8wxZkEtr1hE10vsBuGkRNTNAhgvK6YHvZwbKdlXSYS0k9cwALllPbDHnr/aJ6A

Re: RFS: ruby-rails-asset-jqueryui

On ശനി 09 ജനുവരി 2016 10:02 വൈകു, Balasankar C wrote: > Cool. I'll review and reply. :) Ok, here is a basic review. 0. You are building the binary libjs-jqueryui also. But there already exists a package called libjs-jquery-ui . I think that satisfies your need. 1. README.md in the repo conta

Re: RFS: ruby-rails-asset-jqueryui

On 9 January 2016 9:41:54 pm IST, i.vikra...@gmail.com wrote: >Hi, > > I prepared the packaging of ruby-rails-asset-jqueryui. Cool. I'll review and reply. :) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

RFS: ruby-omniauth-ldap [Bugfix: #801252]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I've pushed a new revision of ruby-omniauth-ldap to alioth repo, which fixes the RC bug #801252. Also did some polishing on the package related files. Please upload. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

RFS: ruby-rack-contrib [Bugfix: #809288]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I've pushed a new revision of ruby-rack-contrib to alioth repo. I have added a patch which closes the bug #809288. Also bumped the debhelper compatibility to 9. Please review and upload. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

RFS: asciiart

-extras/asciiart.git in alioth. Please consider to review it and upload. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Lintian warning on Ruby applications

ided to go with the latter. [0] https://rubygems.org/gems/asciiart -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: gem2deb: installing packages with the same layout as Rubygems

On 13 November 2015 10:10:11 pm IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >Hello everyone, > >TL;DR: with gem2deb 0.23 in experimental you can tell dh_ruby to >install >using the same layout as Rubygems by adding `export DH_RUBY = >--gem-install` to your debian/rules. > >I have just

RFS: ruby-omniauth-openid [Bugfix: #795726]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey, I've pushed an update to ruby-omniauth-openid which closes the bug #795726. I ported the tests to RSpec3 syntax. Please review and upload. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

RFS: ruby-settingslogic [Bugfix : #797258]

Hey, I have ported the tests of ruby-settingslogic to RSpec3 which fixed #797258. I've also bumped the standards version to 3.9.6, debhelper compatibility to 9 and fixed the lintian warnings. Please review and upload. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

RFS: ruby-i18n-inflector-rails [Bugfix: #796021]

Hey, I have ported the tests of ruby-i18n-inflector-rails to support RSpec3 and Ruby2.2 which fixed #796021. Please review and upload. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

RFS: ruby-warden [Bugfix : #795123]

Hi, I've pushed a revision to ruby-warden which fixes the RC bug #795123. Ported the tests to follow RSpec 3 syntax. Please review and upload. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

RFS: ruby-jwt [Bugfix : #794259]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey, I've fixed bug #794259 in ruby-jwt and have pushed the update to alioth repo. Please review and upload. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

RFS: ruby-rack-protection [Bugfix : #797257]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey, I have fixed bug #797257 in ruby-rack-protection and have pushed the update to alioth repo. Please review and upload. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

RFS: ruby-http-form-data

to review it and upload. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

[Bugfix - #796735] RFS: ruby-omniauth-kerberos

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I've pushed a new debian revision to ruby-omniauth-kerberos which closes #796735. Please review and upload. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

RFS : ruby-fog-vmfusion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I added Breaks+Replaces relationship of ruby-fog-vmfusion with ruby-fog ( 1.25~ ) which was causing the RC bug #788544. The revision is pushed to alioth. Please upload it. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP

Re: RFS : ruby-fog-vmfusion

On 26 July 2015 7:38:23 pm IST, Pirate Praveen prav...@onenetbeyond.org wrote: On Sunday 26 July 2015 05:14 PM, Balasankar C wrote: Hi, I added Breaks+Replaces relationship of ruby-fog-vmfusion with ruby-fog ( 1.25~ ) which was causing the RC bug #788544. The revision is pushed to alioth

Paperclip gem - Tests fail in a weird way

this? The complete build log and the test file in consideration are attached. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in integration_spec.rb Description: application/ruby dpkg-buildpackage: source package ruby-paperclip dpkg-buildpackage: source version 4.3.0-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution

RFSs : ruby-dataobjects-mysql and ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi team, The packages ruby-dataobjects-mysql and ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3 have been updated to their latest upstream versions. These updates fixes the RC bugs #791776 and #791777. Please review and upload them. - -- Regards Balasankar C http

Re: ruby-grape-entity

that bug with your package. :) - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVpnZaAAoJEJbtq5sua3FxB9gIAKFdAxDcM1M7Wvn4lBSLgSkf Q/zm3zFOlsSXVdj/Ff0r901d0zzABFxLpCdgMEeB/heqg4qlj9XXrrljpRAoPLPl JmRfiTbxpN41Dh0vKh+elnVujjFPy2UutRZP5PPHuAegz

RFS : ruby-faker

. :) - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVoQXFAAoJEJbtq5sua3Fx54sIAKG3B8+WljzAN7zCOCGiUhzJ /ZLzFQVOQ99JRS+5OesqJSwv6N4HAgjp9Tp/Ud+iJuatOGC0CR0B+PNuOslJ5Jia j01zEW2jUVCxqKRfGwq47MpQrXtoIMfsBwpUkrau2Yw7cemPExWMGIWCdhD+jAl4

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On ചൊവ്വ 07 ജൂലൈ 2015 10:58 വൈകു, Hleb Valoshka wrote: On 7/7/15, Balasankar C balasank...@autistici.org wrote: These are the messages that I got - http://paste.debian.net/279890/ Thanks, I suppose they are gone now. Yes. Those messages

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On ചൊവ്വ 07 ജൂലൈ 2015 09:56 വൈകു, Hleb Valoshka wrote: Which messages? I see nothing. But I use jessie so my lintian may be outdated a bit. These are the messages that I got - http://paste.debian.net/279890/ - -- Regards Balasankar C http

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

: Can't sponsor as I am not a DD. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVm/AqAAoJEJbtq5sua3FxzcEIAKwj9jKtIADTt9oaOFwQKxoU V32UXgVUYrWxOfFfy5+oHnqIIL/jn1oTvgynrE4MOgO+dG70BrwqDsDalk0bqXaL UWiHNBg0QMnjAs7N2kJ1ZPPmawM0Cki

Re: rails-assets-jeresig-jquery-hotkeys

. Add it to debian/ruby-rails-assets-jeresig--jquery.hotkeys.docs 5. Add dep3 headers to the patch. Push the patch and run `quilt header -e --dep3` command. Fill in necessary details. These are the stuff I suggest to be fixed. :) Maybe others can suggest more modifications. -- Regards Balasankar

Re: rails-assets-jeresig-jquery-hotkeys

On വെള്ളി 03 ജൂലൈ 2015 04:47 വൈകു, Balasankar C wrote: On 2015-07-03 15:38, Syam G Krishnan wrote: Hi team, I've pushed new upstream package for rails-assets-jeresig-jquery-hotkeys. Please review and upload them. Peace, Syam I did a quick look at the package (not a DD yet, so can

Re: rails-assets-jeresig-jquery-hotkeys

, more eyes means less bugs. :D - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVlnM2AAoJEJbtq5sua3Fxk3cIAIiFPdCis1hp/fQ17BXxDBRG sHeQe3hDFMqI+rfzyPDnrVVgyUWcElXmR9oAfEl8sOw04i+oAOz9EoV0S/9XVu93

Re: gem2deb, git-buildpackage and 1.8 source format

On 2015-06-30 14:39, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Tuesday 30 June 2015 02:32 PM, Balasankar C wrote: On 2015-06-30 13:39, Pirate Praveen wrote: It seems to be misconfiguration at your end. I am having no issues with `gem2deb omniauth-kerberos` and it builds fine. PS : AFAIK, it is the first

Re: Ruby BoF at Debconf15: which format?

? +1 to this. Live video interaction will be better. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVkTjqAAoJEJbtq5sua3FxOGYH/2GkiuCWM3caBKCXxb9z0NRE H97OgNUnHbdRDC6NXnbOp4JogpDgqc/sNC/yK50DCh0YOWbnnA0AaUah7bamsyvQ

Re: RFS: ruby-slack-notifier

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On ഞായര്‍ 28 ജൂണ്‍ 2015 11:26 രാവിലെ, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:07:01AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: Hi, I've packaged the gem 'slack-notifer' which is in the runtime dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy

Monthly IRC Meeting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Since July is here in two days, shouldn't we plan the next IRC meeting (possibly discussing the issues after Ruby 2.2, I guess)? This time, can we have the time slot a little bit early compared to the last one? - -- Regards Balasankar C http

Updating packages issue - orig.tar.gz invalid size hash

the files to the directory I got by 'apt-get source' for uploading seems to be a waste of time. Why is there a change in dsc files built by me and one in Debian archive? -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: Updating packages issue - orig.tar.gz invalid size hash

that. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVjlvUAAoJEJbtq5sua3Fx8qEH/iWSauz6A0b7O2BW//0uiUwj YzzFuvqg073JiugWcjfwz0vxn0pysEfRTnToU5qy4WexVgvMI7L2KglW6O4GW4Xu jEM24zBzDOHSeaQSbmbSrCtXdtQoNza8e13M0jNFYN6/xjYWCT6RuoULENkvmxOo

RFS: ruby-slack-notifier

and upload. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVj4f8AAoJEJbtq5sua3Fx2WMH/AxbjX4GOwjN8N6y0Ti4AwM3 WwiBGJfhnYZih9BaCjaYcTELdyNYIjhKDPjuEmHfrQYPNrUF/brvSmRZx7l3BwVB Ft4vZw+MRw0ATytAw3C1wxCqPqJkXtsv/I43U0mmXwjd7Rv9jOeNr12KnL0vCq0m

Re: ruby-dep-selector

On 25 June 2015 12:05:58 am IST, Hleb Valoshka 375...@gmail.com wrote: Hi team! Current version of packaged ruby-dep-selector is 0.0.8, aptitude tells that nothing need it so possibly it was a builddep for another package. I want to update it to the latest version, as ruby-solve I'm working on

Re: visualizate gem's dependencies

here - https://gitlab.com/debian-diaspora/gemdeps -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5585c29f.4040

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

Hi, I've made the corrections you pointed out and pushed to the repo. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55843849.5010...@autistici.org

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

The upstream source contained jquery.js file without source. It is repacked to remove that file. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVgDWoAAoJEJbtq5sua3FxUv4H/RnasE8DKjN8TiqypQRQBbJH J2lbog

Ruby 2.2 Transition - Wiki Page

that everyone will help to identify the issues and solve them. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Ruby2.2 -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

caused. That's Ok. :) . BTW, I've updated it to use unstable. Please review and upload when you are free. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Gem which uses dummy rails app for tests

On ഞായര്‍ 14 ജൂണ്‍ 2015 11:39 വൈകു, Balasankar C wrote: Hi, Is there any documentation available on how to handle gems that use a dummy rails app to test their functionality? I patched out the bundler requirements but am getting this error /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rails/application

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

On 16 June 2015 2:20:24 am IST, Cédric Boutillier bou...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 08:12:03PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: Hi, I've prepared the packaging of the gem 'rotp' which is a runtime dependency in the dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy. Since it requires

Re: Re: RFS: ruby-model-tokenizer

and is of no use. Also, you can remove the commented line in d/control that lists the depepndencies (automatically generated by gem2deb). Rest all looks fine to me. PS : You may want to try out the new gem2deb. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

RFS: ruby-rotp

experimental). Even though the gem bundles an executable with it, I've named the package ruby-rotp as the executable usage seemed trivial as per upstream readme. I've pushed it to alioth repo and is available as ruby-rotp. Can someone please review and upload it? - -- Regards Balasankar C http

Gem which uses dummy rails app for tests

`Rails.application.database_configuration`: (RuntimeError) Could not load database configuration. No such file - It seems, the database.yml file is not getting detected. The gem in question is rqrcode-rails3 which is a member of GitLab runtime dependency chain. -- Regards Balasankar C http

Re: RFS: ruby-encryptor

. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/557c8c43.20...@autistici.org

RFS: ruby-encryptor

. Please consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/557af6c0.9090

Re: DONE: ruby-delayed-job

On വെള്ളി 12 ജൂണ്‍ 2015 05:55 വൈകു, Cédric Boutillier wrote: I've uploaded the package to the NEW queue. Thanks Cédric. :) -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: RFS : ruby-delayed-job

. :) Cheers, Cédric -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5579a592.8030...@autistici.org

Re: Binary executable name conflicts with existing package

On ബുധന്‍ 10 ജൂണ്‍ 2015 03:45 വൈകു, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Hey, * Balasankar C balasank...@autistici.org [150610 04:27]: Hi, One of the gems I packaged recently (rexical) ships a binary executable named 'rex'. But there is already a package by perl team named 'rex' which also

Binary executable name conflicts with existing package

Hi, One of the gems I packaged recently (rexical) ships a binary executable named 'rex'. But there is already a package by perl team named 'rex' which also ships a binary of the same name. This resulted in the bug #788294. What is the correct procedure to follow? Renaming the binary (but the

RFS : ruby-delayed-job

to review it and upload. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVagWgAAoJEJbtq5sua3FxwREH/0y/M7eIBiug3doZoX6cQB9O 7jpvKbUMP6cWa+TsQWlK/VeHkMIZW3s711XnvdIt0dN53nIKRSQ1LIn3uqn8Qb2W ZQO62DiVI/HqW7uSRKMy8q39FTbwQDU84

RFS: ruby-browser

. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/556802c1.7010...@autistici.org

Re: RFS: ruby-attr-required

Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55670e65.7000...@autistici.org

Using RSpec instead of Rake for running tests

-tests.rake file give me the following output - http://paste.debian.net/184553/ . Fixing that also would be enough I guess. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Multiple gemspecs in source

.gemspec file in this directory: github-linguist.gemspec, github-linguist-grammars.gemspec (RuntimeError) How to handle multiple gemspecs inside the source of a single gem? Is there any example that I can refer? [1] https://github.com/github/linguist Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

Re: Re: Multiple gemspecs in source

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks. That did the trick. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVVjjzAAoJEJbtq5sua3Fx7nMH/3Ad63qrinG9XbVd34pQg2KM v2Nw5eiM+AL0hddmt3tkklCNv

Re: Gem bundles /bin/rake with it

attached the one packaged in my previous mail. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVFo8aAAoJEJbtq5sua3Fx6/gH/0Tpza+0ivJAJMFwqNrc4lbL h2j34chye6dpdBWTCHKLWSuywj1f/mLSC+jDnOn+htw9oWgdnhv5MHbeTI9zR4jW

Re: Gem bundles /bin/rake with it

On ശനി 28 മാര്‍ച്ച് 2015 05:14 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: rake inside gem just loads the real rake. Ah. Ok. What about the readygo? Can I skip that also? -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: RFS: ruby-test-unit-context

, is the Ruby team policy documented somewhere? Or is it existent only in mailing list archives? -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https

RFS: ruby-fog-atmos

to review it and upload it. Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54d368f3.9060...@autistici.org

RFS: ruby-fog-ecloud

Hi, I've prepared the packaging of ruby-fog-ecloud. It is checked with pbuilder and found ok. Lintian check was also clean. I've uploaded it to the alioth repo /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-fog-ecloud.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in

RFS: ruby-test-unit-context

Hi I've prepared the packaging of ruby-test-unit-context. It has been tested with pbuilder and debci and found ok. Lintian check was also clean. The package has been pushed to alioth repo /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-test-unit-context.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards Balasankar

RFS: ruby-haml-rails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've updated the package ruby-haml-rails to latest version (0.8.2) and uploaded it to alioth. It is tested in pbuilder, debci and found ok. It is also lintian-ok. Please consider to review it and upload it. - -- Regards Balasankar C http

RFS: ruby-active-model-serializers

Consider to review it and upload it. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUySbvAAoJEJbtq5sua3FxKPUH/2HiQdEZvrxsQQLX3iG9jAv6 Vw6JCDIrz08pbL9G88vLm4wggToFzQtLidY1wWrSbOO12+5bWoaf+W6iBENxaTHv wn5AY

Re: RFS for multiple packages

Since 0.11.1-2 was never uploaded to debian, please merge that section in debian/changelog to 0.12.1-1 Done and pushed. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

RFS for multiple packages

know if it is against the mailing list policy to send multiple RFSs in a single mail. I am extremely sorry if it is. - -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUwzZ4AAoJEJbtq5sua3FxNAoH/03wIG5cyWCknmnbFVpeUZso

RFS: ruby-redis-activesupport

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-redis-activesupport. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I've pushed the package to alioth repo /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-redis-activesupport.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in Freedom

RFS: ruby-redis-rack

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-redis-rack. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I've pushed the package to alioth repo /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-redis-rack.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in Freedom is never easily won

Test Error - toplevel constant Rack referenced by Redis::Rack

) instead of the folder inside lib/redis/ folder. Is there any way to solve this? -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in Freedom is never easily won, but once established, freedom lasts, spreads and chokes out tyranny. - Trent Lott signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Test Error - toplevel constant Rack referenced by Redis::Rack

Is there any way to solve this? I fixed it by adding Dir[lib/*/*].each { |f| t.libs f } to the debian/ruby-tests.rake file. Is that ok to do? -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

RFS: ruby-redis-store

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-redis-store. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I've pushed the package to alioth repo /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-redis-store.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in Freedom is never easily won

Re: Tests not being run in pbuilder

that underscore, it was a typo. -- Regards Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/096f9fa2fdb0ddaf14ca15789753c...@autistici.org

  1   2   >