Hey,
I'd like to join pkg-ruby-extras team as I intend to package
ruby-beautify and ruby-aws.
While I am a senior software developer, my Debian packaging experience
is limited to helping with maintaining how-can-i-help package. But I am
eager to learn and I do like to read documentation! :)
My a
Hey,
After a long journey during which I made friends with some devtools that
I didn't even know existed, I've finally finished packaging my first
ruby package - ruby-beautify.
I've checked:
- builds fine under pbuilder
- installs and runs fine under schroot
- autopkgtest-pkg-ruby reports no test
Hey,
On 21/10/14 23:27, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Here are a few remarks about minor details:
>
> - debian/control: I would remove from the description the fact that it
> can be used as a build-dependence for ruby-gherkin. It doesn't help
> the user (only the maintainer of ruby-gherkin, i.e.
Hey,
I'm working on packaging ruby-aws (gems for interfacing with Amazon Web
Services [1]). I do have a few questions about packaging it:
1. Because of the nature of aws, a few tests require internet access and
AWS account (+ generated AWS key). During the first run of those tests,
user is asked
Hey,
We have quite a few Debian Continuous Integration [1] test failures.
Some of those failures were caused by minor testing issues [2] that
don't affect package usability and can be easily fixed. However, I
wonder what is our current policy about those failures:
1. Should we file a bug report f
On 14/01/15 13:35, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:44:43PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> We spoke some time ago [1] about the possibility to have a Ruby sprint again
>> this year.
>>
>> Like in 2014, Debian France will be organizing a MiniDebConf [2], this
Hey,
On 28/01/15 00:56, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Seeing the enthousiasm for Paris, I already contacted IRILL, and we have
> a room there for April 8-10. The only thing to sort out is then, except
> the mail to debian-sprint@ is finding accomodation for the non-locals.
Both Paris and Lyon are to
Hey,
On 04/02/15 15:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/02/15 at 17:49 +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> The Ruby team is planning to hold a Sprint meeting in Paris on
>> April 8-10, as a satellite event of the Lyon Mini DebConf.
>> The sprint will be kindly hosted by IRILL.
>
>
Hey,
On 28/05/15 23:42, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> The wiki page is: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/IRCMeetings
I've added myself to the list.
> I would propose Thursday, June 4, 20:00 UTC if there is no objection
> (the day has been chosen randomly, the time was what we used before).
>
>
Hey,
On 06/08/15 15:43, David Suárez wrote:
> The upload of the new package ruby-aws, introduced #788906 bug, due to both
> packages installing the same file '/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/aws.rb'.
>
> Both packages provides the same functionality, interfacing amazon AWS
> services. ruby-aws-sdk is
Hey,
May I kindly ask for sponsorship of ruby-beautify (0.97.3-1) (changelog
commit 2684a1705768e8ac31036f5b4d3ad276a537b42d)?
It is almost the same version I packed during our last Ruby Sprint - the
only changes are:
- New upstream (few minor fixes)
- Added missing import for rspec tests
- Fixe
Hey,
May I ask for sponsorship of ruby-aws (2.10.2-2) (changelog commit
3516062559025b261819a940980504903bf7c32d)?
This is the same gem version that is already in the repository - two
fixes were added:
- Conflicts with ruby-aws-sdk (they both provide the same functionality
but their files collide
Hey,
On 11/08/15 17:08, David Suárez wrote:
> El Domingo, 9 de agosto de 2015 00:50:53 Tomasz Nitecki escribió:
>
>> If no one has a better idea, I'll update ruby-aws accordingly
>
> Updating on my side too.
>
> As you package have not yet entered testing, I w
Hey,
One of the files of the recently uploaded ruby-base32 did conflict with
ruby-aws [1][2]. Pirate Praveen already fixed it in ruby-base32 [3] but
since the conflicting file seems to be really generic
(/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/version.rb) I'd like to move it in ruby-aws
too, just to avoid any p
Hey,
On 07/06/16 10:55, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2016, ജൂൺ 7 1:29:13 PM IST, "Cédric Boutillier" wrote:
>> You fixed only ruby-base32 as far as I can see. Tomasz was talking
>> about ruby-aws, which should also not let version.rb in
>> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby.
>
> I had fixed it locally, but
Hey,
On 29/08/17 00:07, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> To: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
> Subject: help wanted with the Ruby toolchain
> Basically we need help with the tasks described above, because depending
> on only the two of us will make the upcoming transition take longer than
> usual. Neither
Hey,
I've updated ruby-aws-sdk (new upstream, some minor changes). I'd
appreciate if someone could take a look and upload it. Thanks :)
Regards,
T.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey,
On 05/09/17 18:27, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> I took a look on this package after your RFS and most of the
> modifications seems ok, but I do not know why did you update the years
> of upstream copyright if they did not do it. Could you clarify it to
> me? Has some especific reason?
My mistake
Hey,
On 06/09/17 15:11, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> I uploaded it. I just added the Testsuite field in debian/control to
> mark it as autopkgtest-able.
Thanks! :)
Just one question - if a gem/package doesn't contain any tests, should
we always add 'Testsuite' field?
Regards,
T.
signature.asc
D
Hey,
ruby-aws-sdk started to fail during CI run [1] due to ruby-json version
requirement. This issue was (hot)fixed in Ubuntu version [2][3] so I've
ported their patch to us. Additionally, I've refreshed the package
(changed vcs to salsa, updated dates and http links, etc.). Please
review and uplo
Hey,
On 19/03/18 23:37, Georg Faerber wrote:
> I'll go to the MiniDebConf in May in Hamburg. I would like to meet some
> of you in person, and I could imagine to do a sprint over there.
>
> Anybody around?
I plan to attend both the MiniDebCamp and MiniDebConf in Hamburg :)
Regards,
T.
signa
Hey,
On 10/04/18 16:01, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I started a migration of gemwatch off alioth. It's new home for now is:
> https://gemwatch.debian.net/
Yay, thanks for taking care of this :)
> Let me know if you find any issues. It looks good to me so far, and I
> plan to make this switch on a
Hey,
On 11/04/18 18:17, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> yes, gemwatch.debian.net does not have the cache of previous versions
> that we have on alioth, so it's expected that there won't be old
> versions. I could copy that cache over, but I'm not sure we gain
> anything by doing that.
I don't think tha
Hey,
On 27/05/18 23:56, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I have been thinking for some time now about the idea of another sprint
> for the Ruby team. After Curitiba two years ago, what about having a new
> meeting, in Europe this time?
I'm all for it :)
> I can propose Paris (although I don't know wh
24 matches
Mail list logo
