Re: [RFS] ruby-octokit

2020-02-04 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 26/01/20 6:10 pm, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi > I have updated ruby-octokit to version - 4.15.0 . It builds fine on a > clean chroot, is lintian-clean and the autopkgtests pass as well. I > have pushed my changes here: [1]. This update is needed for gitlab. > Needs review and sponsorship. > >

[RFS] ruby-octokit

2020-01-26 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi I have updated ruby-octokit to version - 4.15.0 . It builds fine on a clean chroot, is lintian-clean and the autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed my changes here: [1]. This update is needed for gitlab. Needs review and sponsorship. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/ruby-octokit

Re: RFS: ruby-octokit

2019-01-22 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Uploaded. On 1/22/19 11:04 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *octokit*. The package was > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. > I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at >

RFS: ruby-octokit

2019-01-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *octokit*. The package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-octokit Please consider to review and

Re: RFS: ruby-octokit, ruby-hoe, ruby-request-store

2014-08-15 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi Caitlin, I had today a look at ruby-hoe. The package looks great. I have two comments: - I think the upstream version should be 3.0.12+dfsg, since the upstream archive is repacked to remove the Hoe.pdf file. This was the case for some time, but then we overlooked it, it seems. - The

Re: RFS: ruby-octokit, ruby-hoe, ruby-request-store

2014-08-15 Thread Cédric Boutillier
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi Caitlin, I had today a look at ruby-hoe. The package looks great. I have two comments: - I think the upstream version should be 3.0.12+dfsg, since the upstream archive is repacked to remove the Hoe.pdf file. This was the

Re: RFS: ruby-octokit, ruby-hoe, ruby-request-store

2014-08-15 Thread Caitlin Matos
On 15/08/14 03:31 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi Caitlin, I had today a look at ruby-hoe. The package looks great. I have two comments: - I think the upstream version should be 3.0.12+dfsg, since the upstream archive is

Re: RFS: ruby-octokit, ruby-hoe, ruby-request-store

2014-08-13 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi Caitlin, On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: I have uploaded these 3 packages to git. DDs, please check them when you have a chance. ruby-request-store is a new package. I packaged it because it is required to update another package, ruby-gon. This is my first

Re: RFS: ruby-octokit, ruby-hoe, ruby-request-store

2014-08-13 Thread Caitlin Matos
On 13/08/14 04:54 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi Caitlin, On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: I have uploaded these 3 packages to git. DDs, please check them when you have a chance. ruby-request-store is a new package. I packaged it because it is required to

RFS: ruby-octokit, ruby-hoe, ruby-request-store

2014-08-10 Thread Caitlin Matos
I have uploaded these 3 packages to git. DDs, please check them when you have a chance. ruby-request-store is a new package. I packaged it because it is required to update another package, ruby-gon. This is my first time doing a package from scratch (though gem2deb did most of the work), so