RFS: ruby-ronn

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-ronn (0.7.3-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * d/control: - added Vcs headers - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) - wrap sort - added Testsuite headers * d/copyright: remo

RFS: ruby-gelf

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-gelf (1.4.0-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * d/control: - bumped standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) - added Testsuite header Could any dd please have a look? Thanks, Jonas -- To UN

RFS: ruby-httpauth

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-httpauth (0.2.1+gh-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. . [ Cédric Boutillier ] * debian/control: remove obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed flag * use canonical URI in Vcs-* fields . [ Jonas Genannt ] * Imported Ups

RFS: ruby-contest

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-contest (0.1.3-3) unstable; urgency=low * Team upload. [ Cédric Boutillier ] * debian/control: - remove obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed flag - use canonical URI in Vcs-* fields * debian/copyright: use DEP5 official URL fo

RFS: ruby-colored

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-colored (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * added patch for autopkg tests * d/docs: install readme to package * d/control: - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) - removed white

RFS: ruby-columnize

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-columnize (0.8.9-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. . [ Cédric Boutillier ] * debian/control: - remove obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed flag - use canonical URI in Vcs-* fields . [ Nitesh A Jain ] * Impor

RFS: ruby-escape

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-escape (0.2-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * d/ruby-tests.rb: removed modify of library load path * d/control: - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) - added testsuite header Could

RFS: ruby-base62

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-base62 (1.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * d/control: - added Testsuite header - switched homepage to https - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) Could any dd please have a

RFS: ruby-albino

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-albino (1.3.3-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * d/control: - added Testsuite header - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) - removed new lines - changed homepage to https *

RFS: ruby-text

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-text (1.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Imported Upstream version 1.3.0 * d/control: - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) - added testsuite header - switched homepage to

RFS: ruby-classifier

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-classifier (1.3.4-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * d/control: - added Testsuite header - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) * Switched Homepage to Github, rubyforge is gone Could

RFS: ruby-shoulda

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-shoulda (3.5.0-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * d/copyright: update to format 1.0 * d/control: - added Testsuite header - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) Could any dd please

RFS: ruby-notify

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-notify (0.5.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * reupload to ship new gemspec file * d/control: - changed homepage to https - bumped standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) Could any dd please hav

RFS: ruby-filepath

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-filepath (0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * rebuild package to ship new gemspec file * d/control: - bumped standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) - added Testsuite headers * d/copyright,co

RFS: ruby-daemons

Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-daemons (1.1.9-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * rebuild package to ship new gemspec file * d/copyright: switched to Copyright format 1.0 * d/control: - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes nee

RFS: ruby-beautify

Hey, After a long journey during which I made friends with some devtools that I didn't even know existed, I've finally finished packaging my first ruby package - ruby-beautify. I've checked: - builds fine under pbuilder - installs and runs fine under schroot - autopkgtest-pkg-ruby reports no test

RFS: ruby-ejs

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-ejs. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I've pushed the package to alioth repo/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-ejs.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in "Freedom is never easily won, but once establi

RFS: ruby-crass

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-crass. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I've pushed the package to alioth repo/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-crass.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in "Freedom is never easily won, but once esta

RFS: ruby-fastimage

Dear folks, The following package is ready to be uploaded. Could you please sponsor them? * ruby-fastimage: Finds the size or type of image as little as needed * ITP: #759421 * Description: FastImage does this minimal fetch for image types GIF, JPEG, PNG, TIFF, BMP and PSD. And

RFS: ruby-notifier

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-notifier. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I've pushed the package to alioth repo /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-notifier.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in "Freedom is never easily won, but on

RFS: ruby-responders

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-responders. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I've pushed the package to alioth repo /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-responders.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in "Freedom is never easily won, bu

RFS: ruby-browser

Hi, As part of GitLab packaging, I've packaged the gem 'browser'. It is lintian clean and it builds succesfully in chroot (I used sbuild). I've pushed it to out alioth repo and can be cloned from git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-browser.git Please review and upload the package. -- Re

RFS: ruby-cleanroom

Hi team, please upload ruby-cleanroom, it's required for some chef related tools I'm planning to package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caab-kcmfncf

RFS: ruby-encryptor

Hi, As part of GitLab packaging, I've prepared the packaging for the gem encryptor and pushed it to alioth. It is a runtime dependency of attr_encrypted gem. The package builds perfectly on chroot (sbuild) and is lintian-happy. It can be cloned from our alioth repo under the name ruby-encryptor.

RFS: ruby-rotp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I've prepared the packaging of the gem 'rotp' which is a runtime dependency in the dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy. Since it requires RSpec 3, I have targeted it for experimental. It builds fine in chroot (with RSpec 3 from experi

RFS: ruby-progressbar

Hi team, please upload new version of ruby-progressbar. It's not the latest version, but as gems which require it (fuubar and several packages i'm working on) require ~> 1.4, i don't think that it worth efforts to package the latest one. More info about it: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/20

RFS: ruby-retryable

Hi team, please upload ruby-retryable, it's required for berkshelf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAAB-KcnC5G++VMTaZgCB=08POx=kF0NE3w39=6fmlzr2go3.

RFS: ruby-solve

Hi team! Please upload ruby-solve, it's required for berkshelf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caab-kcnatumwrhfb9q+8n5bwawdhtim1-h0ugfap7-vkuab...@m

RFS : ruby-faker

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I've packaged the gem faker, which is a build dependency for devise-two-factor. It is lintian happy and builds fine in a clean chroot (sbuild). I've pushed it to alioth and is available under ruby-faker.git Please review and upload. :) - -- Re

RFS: ruby-raindrops

Hi team, I've pushed new version of ruby-raindrops, please upload. Thanks in advance. ruby-raindrops (0.16.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 0.16.0 * Drop 0003-test-test_linux.rb-use-plain-ASCII-in-tempfile-name.patch * Reflect license change to LGPL-2.1+ -- Hleb

RFS: ruby-akismet

Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem akismet. The package was tested on pbuilder and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've uploaded the package to the alioth repo which may be found at https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-akismet.git Please conside

RFS : ruby-encryptor

Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded: ruby-encryptor It is lintian clean and checked with pbuilder. Could you please sponsor them? Thanks, Sudheesh

RFS: ruby-sawyer

Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded: ruby-omniauth-oauth It is lintian clean and checked with pbuilder. Could you please sponsor them? Thanks, Sudheesh Shetty

RFS: ruby-ridley

Hi team! Please upload ruby-ridley 4.4.3-2. It has several Depends and Build-Depends fixes. Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-encryptor

Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded: ruby-encryptor It is lintian clean and checked with pbuilder. Could you please sponsor them? Thanks, Sudheesh Shetty

RFS: ruby-gettext

Hi team! Please upload ruby-gettext 3.2.2-2, it fixes #840789 among other changes.

RFS: ruby-schash

Hello, I've packaged the "schash" gem as package ruby-schash. The package is uploaded to mentors here: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ruby-schash And packaging is in the pkg-ruby-extras repository. Could I please have the package reviewed and uploaded? -- Regards, Scott. signature.asc

RFS: ruby-pathutil

Dear folks, The following package is ready to be uploaded. Could you please sponsor them? * Package name: ruby-pathutil Version : 2.6.0 Upstream Author : Jordon Bedwell * URL or Web page : http://github.com/envygeeks/forwardable-extended * License : Expat Des

RFS: ruby-xdg

Dear folks, The following package is ready to be uploaded. Could you please sponsor them? * Package name: ruby-xdg Version : 2.2.3 Upstream Author : rubyworks * URL or Web page : https://rubyworks.github.io/xdg * License : BSD-2-Clause Description : Ruby interface fo

RFS: ruby-snorlax

Hi,I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem snorlax. The package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I'veuploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found athttps://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-snorlax This was an unpackaged gem listed at htt

RFS: ruby-raabro

Hi,I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem raabro. The package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I'veuploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-raabro/ This was an unpackaged gem for diaspora,

RFS: ruby-fugit

Hi,I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem fugit. The package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I'veuploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-fugit This was an unpackaged gem for diaspora, li

RFS: ruby-devise

Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem devise. The package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-devise This was listed under "Minor Updates" tasks for diaspora, which may

RFS: ruby-nokogiri

Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *nokogiri*. The package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-nokogiri This was listed under "Patch Update

RFS: ruby-uuid

Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *uuid*. The package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-uuid This was listed under "Patch Updates" task

RFS: ruby-octokit

Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *octokit*. The package wastested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-octokit Please consider to review and upload

RFS: ruby-declarative

Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *declarative*. The package wastested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-declarative Please consider to revie

RFS: ruby-gitlab

Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *gitlab*. The package wastested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gitlab Please consider to review and uplo

RFS: ruby-carrierwave

Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem carrierwave. The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've uploaded the package to the alioth repo which may be found at [https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-carrierwave](https://salsa.debian.org

RFS: ruby-isolate

Hey, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem isolate. The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've pushed the changes to the salsa repo which may be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-isolate It is to be uploaded to close a b

RFS: ruby-opentracing

Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem opentracing. The package was tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've pushed the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-opentracing Please consider to revi

RFS: ruby-thrift

Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem thrift. The package was tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've pushed the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-thrift Please consider to review and upl

RFS: ruby-globalid

Hey, I have fixed the regression and thus the bug caused by rails. The tests are now passing and the package now is good to go. Since this is blocking rails, requesting you to please review and upload ruby-globalid at the earliest :) The changes can be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-tea

RFS: ruby-sshkey

Hi, I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem sshkey. The package was tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-sshkey Please consider to review and upl

RFS: ruby-carrierwave

Hey, I have fixed an RC bug affecting ruby-carrierwave (#924830). The package now builds fine and is good to go :) Since this is an RC bug, requesting you to please review and upload ruby-carrierwave at the earliest :) The changes can be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-carrierw

RFS : ruby-sassc

Hola, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem sassc. The package was tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It is also lintian clean. I've pushed the package in the salsa repository and the link to the package is *https://salsa.debian.org/sass-team/ruby-sassc

RFS: ruby-openssl

Hey, There was a security issue which is fixed in the latest update. It closes a CVE and thus the bug #911918. The changes may be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-openssl Since it is an RC bug, requesting you to review and upload at the earliest :) Best, Utkarsh

RFS: ruby-maxitest

Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem maxitest. The package was tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've pushed the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/utkarsh2102-guest/ruby-maxitest P.S. Needs to be impor

RFS: ruby-puma

Hi, I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem puma. The package was tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/gizmoo-guest/ruby-puma Please consider to review and uplo

RFS: ruby-jmespath

Hi, I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem jmespath. The package was tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/gizmoo-guest/ruby-jmespath

RFS : ruby-sassc

Hola Team , The following packages are ready to be uploaded I have contacted sass team for sponsoring this and it been over a week that I didn't get any response regarding it, so I am thinking if ruby-team can sponsor this package and take this package under maintenance of ruby-team. Could you pl

RFS: ruby-gravtastic

Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded Could you please sponsor them? ruby-gravtastic to unstable https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gravtastic The package was tested on both gbp and sbuild. They're also lintian-clean. Thank you!

RFS:- ruby-sassc

Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded Could you please sponsor them? ruby-sassc to unstable https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-sassc The package was tested on both gbp and sbuild. They're also lintian-clean. Thank you!

RFS: ruby-combustion

Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem combustion. The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. I've uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-combustion/ Requesting you to please review and upload the same.

Re: RFS: ruby-*

On 19-08-28 10:07:34, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > I did complete fixing the pending test failures (as an attempt to > enable tests in all the packages), thus requesting you to review and > upload the same (since they are NEW). > > ruby-benchmark-memory > ruby-ammeter > ruby-arbre (thanks to terceiro :D

Re: RFS: ruby-*

Hi, On 19-08-28 10:07:34, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > ruby-benchmark-memory Doesn't build for me, the last log lines read: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Reading extended state information... Initializing package states... Writing extended state info

Re: RFS: ruby-*

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:25:15PM +, Georg Faerber wrote: > - Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby in debian/control is obsolete. What's obsolete/unnecessary is `Testsuite: autopkgtest`, when you have debian/tests/control, because dpkg-source will add `Testsuite: autopkgtest` for you. Any other v

Re: RFS: ruby-*

On 19-08-28 11:06:07, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > What's obsolete/unnecessary is `Testsuite: autopkgtest`, when you have > debian/tests/control, because dpkg-source will add `Testsuite: > autopkgtest` for you. > > Any other value of `Testsuite:`, including but not limited to > `autopkgtest-pkg-ruby

Re: RFS: ruby-*

Hey, On 28/08/19 6:55 pm, Georg Faerber wrote: > Hi, > > On 19-08-28 10:07:34, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >> ruby-benchmark-memory > Doesn't build for me, the last log lines read: > > missing: > pkg: > package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy > version: 0.invalid.0 > architect

Re: RFS: ruby-*

On 19-08-28 10:07:34, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > ruby-benchmark-memory > ruby-ammeter > ruby-arbre (thanks to terceiro :D) All uploaded, now in NEW.

Re: RFS: ruby-*

Hey, On 29/08/19 6:25 pm, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 19-08-28 10:07:34, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >> ruby-benchmark-memory >> ruby-ammeter >> ruby-arbre (thanks to terceiro :D) > All uploaded, now in NEW. Thank you so much, Georg. Also, I patched gem2deb to use version=4 in d/watch by default. Gotta w

RFS: ruby-zip

Hi, Just updated the packaged in salsa. Could any DD review and sponsor the upload ? Thanks in advance, -- David

RFS: ruby-kubeclient

Hey, I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gems rails-kubeclient. The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean and autopkgtest passes for the same. I've pushed the package to the ruby-team repo may be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby

[RFS] ruby-octokit

Hi I have updated ruby-octokit to version - 4.15.0 . It builds fine on a clean chroot, is lintian-clean and the autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed my changes here: [1]. This update is needed for gitlab. Needs review and sponsorship. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/ruby-octokit Th

RFS: ruby-elasticsearch

Hey, I have updated ruby-elasticsearch from 5.0.5 to 6.8.0. The required changes can be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/samyak-jn-guest/ruby-elasticsearch/ The package builts fine, and the autopkgtest passes for the same. The d/ch entry includes experimental entry, since it's a major update. (

[RFS] ruby-erubi

Hi, I have updated erubi to version 1.9.0 as needed by gitlab, builds fine in a clean chroot+autopkgtests pass. I have pushed changes to team repo here[1]. Needs review and sponsorship [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-erubi Thanks and regards Nilesh

RFS: ruby-adamantium

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-adamantium. It is lintian clean and tested with sbuild. Further information about this package can be accessed from the URL : https://salsa.debian.org/hacksk-guest/ruby-adamantium also like to add it to: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-a

RFS: ruby-concord

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-concord. It is lintian clean and tested with sbuild. Further information about this package can be accessed from the URL : https://salsa.debian.org/hacksk-guest/ruby-concord also like to add it to: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-concord Consider t

RFS: ruby-procto

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-adamantium. It is lintian clean and tested with sbuild. Further information about this package can be accessed from the URL : https://salsa.debian.org/hacksk-guest/ruby-procto also like to add it to: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-procto

[RFS] ruby-ast

Hi, I have updated the ruby-ast from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 because the package ruby-parser needs it. The updated package has given a clean build on sbuild. No conflicts were found with reverse dependencies. The updated files are pushed to https://salsa.debian.org/avron/ruby-ast. Request for review and sp

[RFS] -- ruby-postmark

Hi team,         I've packed postmark module as a debian package. The repo is available at https://salsa.debian.org/vivekkj/ruby-postmark. Requesting for sponsorship. (This gem is a dependency of pupilfirst) -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Cheers, ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ Vivek K J ⠈⠳⣄ vivek

[RFS] -- ruby-glob

Hi Team,     I've packed ruby-glob which is a dependency of pupilfirst. The package is available at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-glob. Requesting for Sponsorship. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Cheers, ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ Vivek K J ⠈⠳⣄ vivekkj.com OpenPGP_0xCC119

[RFS] ruby-oj

Hello Team, I have updated ruby-oj(3.13.19 -> 3.13.21) .The updated package is available at [0]. Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package ruby-oj is listed in this issue https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/191 , so it will help in packaging gitlab 15.3.0.

[RFS] ruby-spamcheck

Hello Team, I have updated ruby-spamcheck .The updated package is available at [0]. Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package is listed in this issue https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/191 , so it will help in packaging gitlab 15.4.0. [0] https://salsa.debia

[RFS] ruby-faraday

Hello Team, I have |updated ruby-faraday (1.1.0->2.7.1)||| .The updated package is available at [0]. Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package rack-oauth2 (dependency is ruby-faraday) is listed in this issue https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/191 , so it wil

[RFS] -- ruby-signet

Hey team,     I've updated ruby-signet to 0.17.0. I've verified the package is lintian clean and reverse dependencies are building perfectly. I'm a DM, but I don't have access to upload this updated package. This package is updated for updating gitlab to 15.6.1 [1]. ruby-signet -> ruby-goog

RFS: ruby-kaminari

Hello, I just updated ruby-kaminari from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2 Here is the repo that contains the changes made; https://salsa.debian.org/calebpitan/ruby-kaminari Cheers, Caleb

[RFS] -- ruby-lockbox

Hello team, Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-lockbox [1] updated it to v1.1.1 (targeting experimental) Required for Gitlab 15.8.4 [1] -- https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-lockbox Vinay 2F7E 32FC 9C01 622B C797 E60A D3FD E3D9 3A1F CF50

[RFS] -- ruby-spamcheck

Hello Team, I've prepared a fix for #1039950[1] which is required for gitlab 15.11.6. Requesting someone to review & sponsor the same. [1] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039950 [2] - https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-spamcheck Regards, -- Mohammed Bilal 2D65 BC1E B

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

On 31/03/11 at 10:52 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi, > > I need one DD to upload ruby-mocha. It is in our new set of git > repositories, more specifically at: > > git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-mocha.git > > I will be able to do further uploads on my on as a DM. > > Afte

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

Hi, Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > On 31/03/11 at 10:52 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need one DD to upload ruby-mocha. It is in our new set of git > > repositories, more specifically at: > > > > git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-mocha.git > > > > I will b

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

On 02/04/11 at 17:14 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi, > > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > On 31/03/11 at 10:52 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I need one DD to upload ruby-mocha. It is in our new set of git > > > repositories, more specifically at: > > > > > > git+s

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > I think that the only correct Debian way to ensure clean upgrades is to > provide transition packages, unfortunately. Of course, we should also > ensure that r-deps use the ruby-foo packages, but there are many ruby > packages that have no r-deps, or that are ofte

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

On 03/04/11 at 14:24 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > I think that the only correct Debian way to ensure clean upgrades is to > > provide transition packages, unfortunately. Of course, we should also > > ensure that r-deps use the ruby-foo packages, but there ar

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

On 03/04/11 at 14:24 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > I think that the only correct Debian way to ensure clean upgrades is to > > provide transition packages, unfortunately. Of course, we should also > > ensure that r-deps use the ruby-foo packages, but there ar

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > On 03/04/11 at 14:24 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > > I think that the only correct Debian way to ensure clean upgrades is to > > > provide transition packages, unfortunately. Of course, we should also > > > ensure that r-d

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > We still need to update the tracking UDD scripts to ignore the > > transitional packages in migrated packages. > > I'll do that when the packages are accepted, so there's a way to test > that it works. Great. What do you think of centralizing all this transit

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

On 04/04/11 at 10:34 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > > We still need to update the tracking UDD scripts to ignore the > > > transitional packages in migrated packages. > > > > I'll do that when the packages are accepted, so there's a way to test > > that it wo

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > On 04/04/11 at 10:34 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > > > We still need to update the tracking UDD scripts to ignore the > > > > transitional packages in migrated packages. > > > > > > I'll do that when the packages are acce

Re: RFS: ruby-lapack

On 06/04/11 at 04:40 +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > Hi, > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded > (I also verified the points listed on > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyExtras/RequestingSponsorship). > > Could you please sponsor them? > > Vcs-git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-rub

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >