Uploaded, thanks for the improvements in the packaging Sophie :)
Cheers.
--
Lucas Kanashiro
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
Le 22/09/2017 à 14:39, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 09/22/2017 06:02 PM, Sophie Brun wrote:
>> I had also checked if there was another binary with this name in
>> archive. I don't know if the best is to keep the upstream name or to
>> change it to a less "generic" name (maybe gitlab-cli?).
>
Hi,
Le 21/09/2017 à 19:01, Lucas Kanashiro a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> After run lintian these 2 issues was reported:
>
> I: ruby-gitlab: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
> W: ruby-gitlab: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gitlab
>
> The main point here for me is the absence of a CLI's manpage.
Hi,
After run lintian these 2 issues was reported:
I: ruby-gitlab: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
W: ruby-gitlab: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gitlab
The main point here for me is the absence of a CLI's manpage. I've
tried to install it and use it by myself but I can't, the help
Le 21/09/2017 à 15:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 09/21/2017 06:47 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>> After had a look in the spec/spec_helper.rb file I realized that it
>> tries to use require with a relative path, and this will not work in a
>> installed version. So, I think that you could create
On 09/21/2017 06:47 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> After had a look in the spec/spec_helper.rb file I realized that it
> tries to use require with a relative path, and this will not work in a
> installed version. So, I think that you could create a patch to fix it,
> could you do it please?
>
>
Hi Sophie,
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 10:10 +0200, Sophie Brun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following package is ready to be uploaded.
>
> Could you check and sponsor it?
> ruby-gitlab 4.2.0
>
I tried to run autopkgtest against your package and I got the following
error:
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded.
Could you check and sponsor it?
ruby-gitlab 4.2.0
Thanks
Regards,
Sophie
8 matches
Mail list logo