Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

On 16-05-16 15:38:31, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Please do not generate the keys on the fly. Generating keys takes time > and can be flacky if entropy is low. I suggest having them stored in > ASCII-armored form and importing them in a freshly created GNUPGHOME > before running the tests. Alright. >

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

ge...@riseup.net: > On 16-05-16 12:32:48, ge...@riseup.net wrote: > > On 16-05-16 12:04:38, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > > Both the hardcoded path and the binary files have the same root cause: > > > this should all be generated on the fly as part of the test setup > > > process. I really don't think

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

On 16-05-16 12:32:48, ge...@riseup.net wrote: > On 16-05-16 12:04:38, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > Both the hardcoded path and the binary files have the same root cause: > > this should all be generated on the fly as part of the test setup > > process. I really don't think it's a good thing to have

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

On 16-05-16 12:04:38, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > ge...@riseup.net: > > - I've made some progress: […] > > Great! :) Thanks for your input! > I'm surprised you need to both launch and reload gpg-agent. I think it > would also be much better to kill the agent once the tests have been > run. I guess

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

ge...@riseup.net: > On 16-05-11 09:53:06, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > For this reason, I think you should find a way to restore > > `debian/ruby-tests.rake` and make it work with gpg2 as gpg1 is likely > > to go away in some near future… > > - I've made some progress: […] Great! :) I'm surprised

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

On 16-05-11 09:53:06, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > For this reason, I think you should find a way to restore > `debian/ruby-tests.rake` and make it work with gpg2 as gpg1 is likely > to go away in some near future… - I've made some progress: - I've added a patch which injects gpg.conf and

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

On 16-05-13 13:54:25, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:16:50PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote: > > - Because I'll re-enable the tests, I had a look at the dependencies > > (again): mail-gpg depends on pry-nav [1], which depends on pry-remote > > [2], both aren't packaged

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:16:50PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote: > - Because I'll re-enable the tests, I had a look at the dependencies > (again): mail-gpg depends on pry-nav [1], which depends on pry-remote > [2], both aren't packaged yet. So I'll do this as well.. I replied to the ITPs,

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

* ge...@riseup.net [160512 20:17]: > - However, the options I've used assume gnupg-agent >= 2.1~, whereas in > jessie the current version is 2.0.26-6, which means that these won't > work in jessie. As this package won't get into jessie anyway: Is this > ok? Would matter

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

ge...@riseup.net: > On 16-05-11 09:53:06, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > The only mistake I could find by looking at the source is in > > `debian/copyright`: > > > > “MIT” is an ambiguous term for the licence, see > > . > > The term most often

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

On 16-05-11 11:28:03, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Georg and me discussed this a bit on IRC [...] While chatting, zeha recommended to speak with dkg about this, which I just did. He gave me some pointers. I'm now trying to implement these and will send a follow-up. All the best, Georg

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

On 16-05-11 09:53:06, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > The only mistake I could find by looking at the source is in > `debian/copyright`: > > “MIT” is an ambiguous term for the licence, see > . > The term most often refers to the Expat license: >

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

* Jérémy Bobbio [160511 09:55]: > For this reason, I think you should find a way to > restore `debian/ruby-tests.rake` and make it work with gpg2 as gpg1 is > likely to go away in some near future… Maybe this needs a fix in > ruby-gpgme? Seems it's an old and unsolved issue: >

Re: RFS: ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1

ge...@riseup.net: > The following package is ready to be reviewed / uploaded: > > ruby-mail-gpg 0.2.6-1 > > As this is my first package, I would be happy to get some pointers in > case there is anything not in shape. Thanks for your work. The only mistake I could find by looking at the