Hi!
Thanks for the feedback. I've just uploaded gem2deb 0.38 with that change and
other commits from Antonio about ruby2.5.
Cheers,
Cédric
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've just pushed a branch on Salsa called 'sha_digests' with a proposed
> change. I've just removed SHA1 and replaced it with SHA256, and check
> that at least one of SHA256/SHA512 is available in checksums.yaml.
>
>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:13:47PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:32:25PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
[...]
> >
> > I am considering adding Digest::SHA256 to the list of digests tested in
> > gem2tgz and skip the checksum computation if the digest name is not a
>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:32:25PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When trying to package some dependencies for a new version of Nanoc, I
> noticed that some gems start to ship SHA256 digests instead of SHA1 in
> addition to SHA512.
> This happens for example with the ddmetrics gem
>
Hi,
When trying to package some dependencies for a new version of Nanoc, I
noticed that some gems start to ship SHA256 digests instead of SHA1 in
addition to SHA512.
This happens for example with the ddmetrics gem
https://rubygems.org/gems/ddmetrics
As a consequence, gem2deb fails on such gems
5 matches
Mail list logo
