What is +gh? (WAS Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-em-redis_0.3.0+gh-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable)

2014-04-28 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! What does +gh in the version mean? :-) -- Per On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > Accepted: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Format: 1.8 > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:54:50 +0530 > Source: ruby-em-redis > Binary: ruby-em-redis > Archite

Re: What is +gh? (WAS Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-em-redis_0.3.0+gh-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable)

2014-04-29 Thread Per Andersson
(Answering on-list.) On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > 2014-04-29 2:16 GMT+05:30, Per Andersson : >> Hi! >> >> What does +gh in the version mean? :-) > > To show we are using gihub tarballs instead of gem file as source > (mostly for including tests) > > https://wiki.debian

Re: What is +gh? (WAS Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-em-redis_0.3.0+gh-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable)

2014-04-29 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Per Andersson wrote: > (Answering on-list.) > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> 2014-04-29 2:16 GMT+05:30, Per Andersson : >>> Hi! >>> >>> What does +gh in the version mean? :-) >> >> To show we are using gihub tarballs instead

Re: What is +gh? (WAS Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-em-redis_0.3.0+gh-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable)

2014-05-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 02:32 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > This information belongs in debian/README.source or even > debian/copyright, but not in the version number, especially since it > is completely opaque to our users. Cheers, Vincent It is useful when importing multiple tarballs of the sa

Re: What is +gh? (WAS Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-em-redis_0.3.0+gh-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable)

2014-05-02 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 04:34:32PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Tuesday 29 April 2014 02:32 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > This information belongs in debian/README.source or even > > debian/copyright, but not in the version number, especially since it > > is completely opaque to our use

Re: What is +gh? (WAS Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-em-redis_0.3.0+gh-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable)

2014-05-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Saturday 03 May 2014 03:25 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > If you notice this before you push to alioth, you can delete the git > upstream/xxx tag, remove the upstream tarball in the parent directory, > and import again the new tarball from Github with gbp import-orig, > with the very same upstre