Re: comments ruby-stud

2015-07-09 Thread Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)
On 1 Jul 2015, at 6:02 am, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > I uploaded ruby-insist. When building ruby-stud, the tests are not run. > For packages using RSpec, you should either require "rspec/autorun" in > debian/ruby-tests.rb, or use the rake method, otherwise loading the > test files

Re: comments ruby-stud

2015-06-30 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi Tim, I uploaded ruby-insist. When building ruby-stud, the tests are not run. For packages using RSpec, you should either require "rspec/autorun" in debian/ruby-tests.rb, or use the rake method, otherwise loading the test files is not sufficient to actually run them. Cheers, Cédric signature

Re: comments ruby-stud

2015-06-28 Thread Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)
On 28 Jun 2015, at 6:17 am, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 03:02:14AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: >> OK - round two! I’ve replaced the source tar.gz file with the one >> containing specs and updated everything. > >> Tests are now run, but require a new pack

Re: comments ruby-stud

2015-06-27 Thread Cédric Boutillier
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 03:02:14AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > OK - round two! I’ve replaced the source tar.gz file with the one containing > specs and updated everything. > Tests are now run, but require a new package called ruby-insist (ITP > #789998) which I’ve packaged and p

Re: comments ruby-stud

2015-06-25 Thread Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)
On 25 Jun 2015, at 11:32 pm, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:35:04AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: >> Hi Cédric. I’ve updated the description and upgraded to version >> 0.0.20 of the package. The spec directory does not appear to be part >> of a

Re: comments ruby-stud

2015-06-25 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
On 25/06/15 15:32, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > This is a way to go when waiting for upstream to include the specs in > the gem, or if upstream doesn't want to include them for whatever > reason. .. and this reason could be: "you don't need tests because I can't imagine why you could need them": ht

Re: comments ruby-stud

2015-06-25 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi Tim, On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:35:04AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > Hi Cédric. I’ve updated the description and upgraded to version > 0.0.20 of the package. The spec directory does not appear to be part > of any release yet but I’m happy to link it up to a ruby-tests.rb file

Re: comments ruby-stud

2015-06-24 Thread Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)
On 20 Jun 2015, at 7:04 am, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > I had a look at ruby-stud. Could you expand the long description, so > that it has full sentences, and presents the features of the package? > Also, I see that the git repo on GitHub has a spec/ directory. > It would be prefera

comments ruby-stud

2015-06-19 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi Tim, I had a look at ruby-stud. Could you expand the long description, so that it has full sentences, and presents the features of the package? Also, I see that the git repo on GitHub has a spec/ directory. It would be preferable to have test to detect possible regression. Since there is a new