Re: Please test reverse dependencies before uploading new versions (ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab)

2016-11-30 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 30 നവംബര്‍ 2016 06:01 വൈകു, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > I support your request, and urge people uploading libraries (or anything > with reverse dependencies, really) to test their reverse dependencies. > > *However*, looking at the diff between the latest ruby-grape-entity a

Re: Please test reverse dependencies before uploading new versions (ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab)

2016-11-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello Praveen, On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:46:04PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > Last upload of ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab[1][2]. Your last update of > ruby-grape also broke gitlab [3]. Please run build-and-upload script > from pkg-ruby-extras before uploading

Re: Please test reverse dependencies before uploading new versions (ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab)

2016-11-30 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi Praveen, I uploaded using build-and-upload script. I did not think too much because it'd be enough for me. Next time I will recheck it manually. Cheers. 2016-11-30 8:16 GMT-02:00 Pirate Praveen : > Hi Lucas, > > Last upload of ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab[1][2]. Your

Please test reverse dependencies before uploading new versions (ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab)

2016-11-30 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi Lucas, Last upload of ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab[1][2]. Your last update of ruby-grape also broke gitlab [3]. Please run build-and-upload script from pkg-ruby-extras before uploading new version. If it was a stable library with SemVer compliance we could declare more relaxed dependency on

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-entity

2016-03-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 09:48 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 06:54:26PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I updated ruby-grape-entity with latest upstream release (0.5.0) and I need >> sponsorship. > > uploaded > This broke

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-entity

2016-03-19 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
at 06:54:26PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I updated ruby-grape-entity with latest upstream release (0.5.0) and I > need > >> sponsorship. > > > > uploaded > > > > This broke gitlab. It would be better to check reve

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-entity

2016-03-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 16 March 2016 08:16 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Just a ruby's newbie question: what does define a library as stable or not? Usually stable libraries have versions greater than 1.0 and follow Semantic Versioning. See https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/UpstreamPledge for a campaign to

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-entity

2016-03-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:21:12PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 16 March 2016 08:16 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > Just a ruby's newbie question: what does define a library as stable or not? > > Usually stable libraries have versions greater than 1.0 and follow > Semantic Versioning

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-entity

2016-03-15 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 06:54:26PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi, > > I updated ruby-grape-entity with latest upstream release (0.5.0) and I need > sponsorship. uploaded signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: ruby-grape-entity

2016-03-14 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi, I updated ruby-grape-entity with latest upstream release (0.5.0) and I need sponsorship. Thanks. -- Lucas Kanashiro

DONE: ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-15 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:59:56AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:09:06PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > > Hi team, I've finished packaging for 2 longstanding ITP. Please review > > and upload ruby-rack-mount and ruby-grape-entity. > > Jus

Re: ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-15 Thread Hleb Valoshka
On 7/15/15, Balasankar C wrote: > It seems I forgot about you packaging grape-entity. Sorry. I had taken > over the ITP (#720755) few days back. Can you add a closes entry for > that bug in the changelog? I haven't done much in the packaging, so > you may close that bug with your package. :) It

Re: ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-15 Thread Balasankar C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On ?? 15 2015 08:29 , Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:09:06PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: >> Hi team, I've finished packaging for 2 longstanding ITP. Please >> review and upload ruby-rack-mount a

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-07 Thread Balasankar C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On ചൊവ്വ 07 ജൂലൈ 2015 10:58 വൈകു, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 7/7/15, Balasankar C wrote: > >> These are the messages that I got - >> http://paste.debian.net/279890/ > > Thanks, I suppose they are gone now. > > Yes. Those messages are gone. BTW,

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-07 Thread Hleb Valoshka
On 7/7/15, Balasankar C wrote: > These are the messages that I got - http://paste.debian.net/279890/ Thanks, I suppose they are gone now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: ht

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-07 Thread Balasankar C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On ചൊവ്വ 07 ജൂലൈ 2015 09:56 വൈകു, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Which messages? I see nothing. But I use jessie so my lintian may > be outdated a bit. These are the messages that I got - http://paste.debian.net/279890/ - -- Regards Balasankar C http://

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-07 Thread Hleb Valoshka
On 7/7/15, Balasankar C wrote: > I just had a look at rack-mount (coz I once tried to package it, but > left it for later since it had many test failures - so I was > interested to know how you fixed those. :) ). Some suggestions > 1. Try to fix those lintian warnings (Info messages, actually) W

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-07 Thread Balasankar C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On ചൊവ്വ 07 ജൂലൈ 2015 06:39 വൈകു, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Hi team, I've finished packaging for 2 longstanding ITP. Please > review and upload ruby-rack-mount and ruby-grape-entity. > > Hi, I just had a look at rack-mount (co

RFS: ruby-rack-mount, ruby-grape-entity

2015-07-07 Thread Hleb Valoshka
Hi team, I've finished packaging for 2 longstanding ITP. Please review and upload ruby-rack-mount and ruby-grape-entity. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org