On 2016, ജൂൺ 7 3:37:14 AM IST, "Cédric Boutillier" wrote:
>Hi Tomasz,
>
>On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:54:52PM +0200, Tomasz Nitecki wrote:
>
>> One of the files of the recently uploaded ruby-base32 did conflict
>with
>> ruby-aws [1][2]. Pirate Praveen alr
On 2016, ജൂൺ 7 1:29:13 PM IST, "Cédric Boutillier" wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:09:43AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
>> I fixed it already. I was wondering if the gemspec should be renamed
>as well.
>
>You fixed only ruby-base32 as far as I can see. T
Hi,
Background: recent update of ruby-addressable broke gitlab.
https://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/g/gitlab/latest-autopkgtest/log.gz
Could not find gem 'addressable (~> 2.3.8)' in any of the gem sources
listed in your Gemfile or available on this machine.
Reason: Declaring tigh
On 2016, ജൂൺ 15 11:14:35 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>I suffered with this for a long time with rails, vagrant, and redmine,
>and maybe others, and realized that it's easier to just relax the
>dependencies in the metadata with a Debian-specific patch and follow up
>to actual breakage (tests,
On Friday 27 November 2015 09:03 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I commented there; since jquery is backwards compatible except for
> browser support, the dependency can be just `>= 1.11`.
>
gitlab 8.9 wants jquery2
app/assets/javascripts/application.js.coffee:#= require jquery2
I'm patching this
Hi,
The state of ruby gems SemVer compliance -
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/UpstreamPledge
I have been asking rubygems authors about their commitment to SemVer.org
and I’m surprised by the high positive response. This is contrary to the
common belief that rubygems don’t follow any sane proc
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 07:15 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to update ruby-omniauth-google-oauth2 package with the latest
> upstream release (version 0.4.1), and the only reverse dependency is
> gitlab (that depends on version >= 0.2.0~). I did not upload the package
> yet, but i
On Tuesday 28 June 2016 07:45 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Any news?
It seems fine from the changelog.
Would it be okay if we wait for gitlab 8.9 (its already in experimental
and once we upload diaspora 0.5.9.1 to experimental, we can upload both
together to unstable)?
signature.asc
Descriptio
Hi,
I'm trying to update this package (it is in our git repo) and get the
following error during build.
/usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/dependency.rb:319:in `to_specs': Could not
find 'rails-assets-jquery.ui' (~> 1.10) - did find:
[rails-assets-jquery.ui-1.10.4] (Gem::LoadError)
1.10.4 should satis
On Wednesday 29 June 2016 11:39 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to update this package (it is in our git repo) and get the
> following error during build.
>
> /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/dependency.rb:319:in `to_specs': Could not
> find 'rai
Full error message at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829254
There was a similar error message with gitlab which was fixed by updating
libjs-coffeescript. It could be an issue with sprockets as diaspora-installer
works, which uses sprockets 2.12.4
I was able to reproduce the e
On Friday 01 July 2016 11:06 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Can anyone help?
You can get the packages from
https://people.debian.org/~praveen/diaspora/diaspora.list Or I can
provide access to a test machine.
This is blocking gitlab 8.9.0 upload to unstable as well.
signature.asc
Descript
With help from upstream developer lukas, we know this much.
"praveen: not sure if this is already known to you but this is failing
return new AST_SimpleStatement({body:(tmp=expression(true),semicolon(),tmp)})"
I wonder if the last changelog entry of ruby-uglifier is a hint
https://tracker.debian
Hi,
If we start early on, it would be easier when diaspora 0.6 is released.
https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/issues/100
Feel free to pick easier ones from the list and update.
Cheers
Praveen
PS: git.fosscommunity.in is powered by apt-get installed gitlab
signature.asc
De
On Sunday 03 July 2016 03:44 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 11:30:23PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> If we start early on, it would be easier when diaspora 0.6 is released.
>
>> https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/
Control: severity -1 grave
Justification: installation is failing
On Saturday 02 July 2016 03:30 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> With help from upstream developer lukas, we know this much.
>
> "praveen: not sure if this is already known to you but this is failing
&
[will drop debian-ruby from further updates]
On Wednesday 06 July 2016 09:07 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I was able to successfully install 0.5.5.1 in unstable but 0.5.7.1 in
> experimental is failing with same error. So it could be either new code
> in diaspora or one of the changed dep
On 2016, ജൂലൈ 7 1:38:54 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>This is a very shitty way of making things work. So your approach is,
>instead of fixing the Debian package, adding an embedded copy of the
>upstream sources?
No, you are just shouting baseless things that does not help at all. First, if
On 2016, ജൂലൈ 7 1:38:54 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:18:09PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> So I replaced ruby-handlebars-assets deb package with
>handlebars_assets
>> gem and it is also working.
>
>This is a very shitty way of mak
On Thursday 07 July 2016 01:28 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 07:44:00AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016, ജൂലൈ 7 1:38:54 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> This is a very shitty way of making things work. So your approach is,
&g
On Friday 08 July 2016 08:48 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:59:17PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> The problem is libjs-handlebars is a node module (it should be changed
>> to node-handlebars I think) and handlebars_assets expects a browserified
>
On Tuesday 28 June 2016 08:19 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>
>
> On 06/28/2016 11:19 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On Tuesday 28 June 2016 07:45 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>>> Any news?
>> It seems fine from the changelog.
>>
>> Would it be okay
Hi,
Last two uploads of ruby-grape and ruby-rouge broke gitlab. Please
ensure reverse dependencies don't break when uploading new versions.
Follow these steps.
1. Check 'apt-cache rdepends' for a list of packages that depends on
your package.
2. If you find it has reverse dependencies, please che
On 2016, ജൂലൈ 18 1:28:52 PM IST, Robert Oliver wrote:
>I’ve been reading the docs and getting up to speed on the workflow. So
>far, so good. I think I only have one question and the rest should
>fall into place – what branch of Debian should I run to do this work?
>I’ve got a VM image of Jess
First, I really like using build-and-upload script.
But it failed for unicorn with this error
../build-and-upload: 98: local: ../build-area/unicorn_5.0.1-1_amd64.deb:
bad variable name
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/10/2016 03:46 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last two uploads of ruby-grape and ruby-rouge broke gitlab. Please
> ensure reverse dependencies don't break when uploading new versions.
ruby-json upload just broke rails and a whole lot of dependencies.
The following pa
On 07/22/2016 08:28 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> ruby-json upload just broke rails and a whole lot of dependencies.
>
Reported here http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832133
It has 49 reverse dependencies.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/22/2016 10:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday on IRC:
> 23:29 < lucas> long time without doing any ruby packaging, let's hope I
> didn't break the world
>
> Looks like I did :/
I guessed :)
> The failure you quoted is about a strict dependency. Do you know if it's
> justifi
On 07/22/2016 10:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The failure you quoted is about a strict dependency. Do you know if it's
> justified? The changes on ruby-json's side are fairly small. Also it
> seems that the strict dependency was dropped from the gemspec (it's not
> there anymore in version 1.0.2
On 07/22/2016 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> The failure is at:
> ruby-activesupport : Depends: ruby-json (< 2.0) but 2.0.1+dfsg-1 is to
> be installed
I tried relaxing the requirement in rails package and build, but it
fails to build because of circular dependencies :(
s
On 07/22/2016 11:46 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 07/22/2016 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> The failure is at:
>> ruby-activesupport : Depends: ruby-json (< 2.0) but 2.0.1+dfsg-1 is to
>> be installed
>
> I tried relaxing the requirement in rails package and
On 07/22/2016 11:50 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I think the solution is to build rails on a system which still has
> ruby-json 1.8.3 and upload that version to archive.
>
I have built rails locally without strict dependency on ruby-json. If
someone can confirm its okay to upload, I can
On 07/23/2016 01:43 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 12:12:16AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On 07/22/2016 11:50 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> I think the solution is to build rails on a system which still has
>>> ruby-json 1.8.3 and upl
On 07/21/2016 05:40 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:06:14PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>
>> First, I really like using build-and-upload script.
>>
>> But it failed for unicorn with this error
>>
>> ../build-and-upload: 98: local:
On 2016, ജൂലൈ 18 1:28:52 PM IST, Robert Oliver wrote:
>I’ve been reading the docs and getting up to speed on the workflow. So
>far, so good. I think I only have one question and the rest should
>fall into place – what branch of Debian should I run to do this work?
>I’ve got a VM image of Jess
On 2016, ജൂലൈ 24 10:12:59 AM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>
>
>On 2016, ജൂലൈ 18 1:28:52 PM IST, Robert Oliver wrote:
>>I’ve been reading the docs and getting up to speed on the workflow.
>So
>>far, so good. I think I only have one question and the rest should
>>
Hi,
Just wanted to share this here.
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14286#note_13369583
gitlab is planning to move to rails 5, but stretch is going to release
with rails 4.2, I'm asking gitlab upstream to support gitlab 4.2 release
until at least stretch release. After stretch re
https://github.com/GoodGuide/npm_assets/blob/master/README.markdown
Can anyone comment if this can be used instead of browserified js? For example,
can we directly use node-handlebars instead of ruby-rails-assets-handlebars for
diaspora using this method?
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9
https://medium.com/technically-speaking/rails-react-browserify-e315001d5974#.you4k7h14
browserify-rails seems another method but node-browserify has long list of
dependencies as well.
On 2016, ജൂലൈ 28 12:24:28 AM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>https://github.com/GoodGuide/npm_assets/blob/mas
This happened after I ran a dist-upgrade in my local sid system today.
+--+
| Install build-essential
|
+--+
Setup apt archive
---
On 08/13/2016 06:06 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Pirate Praveen [160813 13:57]:
>> gpg: /<>/resolver-qbYTZz/gpg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
>> gpg: Warning: not using 'Sbuild Signer' as default key: No secret key
>> gpg: all values passed to '
hi,
I'm trying to update gemojione to 3.1.0. I thought moving to DH_RUBY =
--gem-install would be better than maintaining patches, but 'config'
folder does not get installed (the overrides in rules method or install
file also fails).
gem2deb bug? Can someone help?
signature.asc
Description: Op
On 08/16/2016 11:43 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm trying to update gemojione to 3.1.0. I thought moving to DH_RUBY =
> --gem-install would be better than maintaining patches, but 'config'
> folder does not get installed (the overrides in rules metho
On Thursday 18 August 2016 11:55 AM, s...@disroot.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated the packaging ruby-fog-core from 1.40 to 1.42. I tested it with
> build-and-upload script from pkg-ruby-extras repo. Two packages
> (ruby-openstack and ruby-rackspace) failed tests, but they were unrelated
> failur
On Thursday 18 August 2016 10:34 PM, Abhijith PA wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> The following package is IMHO ready to be uploaded
>
> * ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails-3.3.3-1
>
> Please review and upload it.
Uploaded, thanks!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Monday 22 August 2016 09:04 PM, s...@disroot.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared the packaging of ruby-fog-cloudatcost. It is lintian clean and I
> tested it with build-and-upload script from pkg-ruby-extras repo.
>
>
> I am still unable to ssh to git.debian.org and I have logged a support
> r
On Tuesday 16 August 2016 06:38 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:43:54AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On 08/16/2016 11:43 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to update gemojione to 3.1.0. I thought moving to DH
On Tuesday 23 August 2016 05:19 PM, s...@disroot.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated the packaging ruby-rack-oauth2 from 1.2.1 to 1.4.0. I tested it
> with build-and-upload script from pkg-ruby-extras repo.
>
> It is pushed to Alioth repo (my ssh access started working).
>
> Please review and upload
On 2016, ആഗസ്റ്റ് 23 7:52:24 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:00:20PM +0000, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> Format: 1.8
>> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:16:51 +0530
>> Source: ruby-handlebars-assets
>> Binary: ruby-handlebars-assets
>> Archi
On Tuesday 23 August 2016 07:58 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 06:48:01PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> Thanks, this is working. I can fix ruby-fog-openstack autopkgtest
>> failures easily once this is uploaded (it would be helpful to remove
>> patch
On 2016, ആഗസ്റ്റ് 26 12:35:33 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:01:11PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 01:31:48PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 23 August 2016 07:58 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> > &
Hi,
Is this change ok? It will not work when build dependencies from
experimental are required but will work in the simple case of just
stashing packages in experimental to not break dependencies in unstable.
diff --git a/build-and-upload b/build-and-upload
index 1a41c68..66fd4d1 100755
--- a/bui
On 2016, ആഗസ്റ്റ് 26 6:06:36 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 07:45:29AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016, ആഗസ്റ്റ് 26 12:35:33 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro
> wrote:
>> >On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:01:11PM -0300, Antonio Ter
On Saturday 27 August 2016 07:02 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I would like to not special case any suite here. you just need an
> experimental chroot, named experimental-${arch}-sbuild, and it just
> works. just like if you were building for e.g. jessie.
>
> if you don't want to have a separate c
Do we really need to generate keys for sbuild?
sudo sbuild-update --keygen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wednesday 31 August 2016 09:51 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:36:56PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> Do we really need to generate keys for sbuild?
>>
>> sudo sbuild-update --keygen
>
> with the newest sbuild, probably not. not sure about
Hi,
Currently build-and-upload checks only main for dependencies so it is
missing diaspora (it is moved to contrib). Can we add contrib and
non-free to build-and-upload?
Praveen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I'm trying to run autopkgtest for gitlab (commited to master branch),
but switching to gitlab user is not working. It is working when I run it
as adt-run ./ --- null locally. But when run from build-and-upload
script, it fails to get a terminal (su: must be run from a terminal.
tried both sudo
On Saturday 17 September 2016 04:27 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to run autopkgtest for gitlab (commited to master branch),
> but switching to gitlab user is not working. It is working when I run it
> as adt-run ./ --- null locally. But when run from build
Hi,
Its pushed to alioth. Can someone check?
Error below:
$ clean
dh clean --buildsystem=ruby --with ruby,systemd
dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=ruby
dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=ruby
dh_ruby --clean
dh_ruby --clean
VERSION= must be specified
dh_auto_clean: dh_ruby --clean returned
Hi,
Before gem-install option was introduced, we were using debian/links to symlink
js files from /usr/share/javascript/foo to
/usr/share/ruby-rails-assets-foo/app/assets/javascripts.
But with gem-install option, version of the gem is added to the directory in
/usr/share/rubygems-integration/
Hi,
I already have it in my $PATH and use it for javascript and go packages.
How about including it in devscripts package? This would be really
helpful for many teams.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Friday 28 October 2016 05:53 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
> I understand olddoc may not be worth the effort to package in
> Debian. (I already tried to reduce dependencies in olddoc
> compared to wrongdoc, but a package is a package...)
>
> Anyways, I suggest you guys grab the generated gemspec from t
[cc me on replies from s390 list]
gitlab-workhorse is blocking gitlab 8.12.3 migration to testing for
sometime now. I fixed two issues with powerpc build but this issue seems
hard to crack.
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843148 for details
Any help fixing this issue would b
On Friday 04 November 2016 04:30 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Go only works on z196, which is only one of the buildds, is that the
> problem here?
It is failing on zemlinsky, earlier successfull build was on zandonai.
So it looks like buildd issue. How do I get it to build with the correct
bu
With the recent upload of mysql-server 5.7, mysql_install_db is
deprecated, we are supposed to use mysqld --initialize.
I tried replacing mysql_init_db with /usr/sbin/mysqld --initialize, but
the options are not a one to one map. Can anyone help with this?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
[adding pkg-mysql-maint]
On Monday 07 November 2016 06:51 PM, Scott Leggett wrote:
> On 2016-11-06.22:48, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> With the recent upload of mysql-server 5.7, mysql_install_db is
>> deprecated, we are supposed to use mysqld --initialize.
>>
>> I tried r
On ബുധന് 09 നവംബര് 2016 12:08 രാവിലെ, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Hope someone from mysql maintainers team can help here.
>
161109 12:04:57 [ERROR] /usr/sbin/mysqld: unknown option
'--initialize-insecure'
161109 12:04:57 [ERROR] Aborting
So it seems mariadb is not a drop in repla
[adding debian-ruby]
On Sunday 23 October 2016 04:23 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> jQuery 3.0 was release back in June, so in principle affected upstreams
> had at least a few months to deal with any fallout. If that's not the
> case, you can refer upstream to this upgrade guide, which documents t
Hi Lucas,
Last upload of ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab[1][2]. Your last update of
ruby-grape also broke gitlab [3]. Please run build-and-upload script
from pkg-ruby-extras before uploading new version. If it was a stable
library with SemVer compliance we could declare more relaxed dependency
on i
On ബുധന് 30 നവംബര് 2016 06:01 വൈകു, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I support your request, and urge people uploading libraries (or anything
> with reverse dependencies, really) to test their reverse dependencies.
>
> *However*, looking at the diff between the latest ruby-grape-entity and
> the one be
On ബുധന് 30 നവംബര് 2016 10:07 വൈകു, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> assuming that will not be fixed upstream anytime soon, do you want to
> try the current state of ruby-jquery-rails in git?
Upstream is using jquery2. So if we embed jquery2 instead of jquery, it
would be better. It is working with emb
[adding debian-ruby and #847353]
On വ്യാഴം 08 ഡിസംബര് 2016 10:34 രാവിലെ, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I think you are only checking for jquery-ui.js and not all the other files
> like jquery-ui/widgets/datepicker.js
>
> I did not see any error in gitlab when using the embedded copy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I'm planning to update gitlab to latest patch release 8.13.11 and
it needs gitlab-turbolinks-classic, which is a fork of
turbolinks. I'm planning to switch to gitlab's fork for
ruby-turbolinks package. I have already made the changes locally
and
On ഞായര് 15 ജനുവരി 2017 09:42 വൈകു, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I would prefer to not do that this close to a freeze. Is there a good
> reason for the fork? What are the differences between the fork and the
> original?
>
Its basically backported changes from newer releases to 2.5 version.
From RE
Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:03:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:>> On ഞായര്
> 15 ജനുവരി 2017 09:42 വൈകു, Antonio Terceiro wrote:>>> I would prefer to not
> do that this close to a freeze. Is there a good
>>> reason for the fork? Wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I'm trying to build ruby-pg 0.19 (for diaspora 0.6.2.0 targeted
for experimental) but in sbuild there were two gemfiles,
pg.gemspec and pg-0.19.gemspec (second one manually created in
debian/rules)
I added DH_RUBY_GEMSPEC to specify pg-0.19.ge
Sorry, my firefox os email client swallowed the contents of my previous
mail, it seems :(
Switching back to turbolinks in buster would be just a matter of
changing watch file and removing copy-gemspec file. Maintaining a patch
is comparatively more work for the same result, but I will do it anyway
Hi team,
I tried backporting git 2.11 support from gitlab 8.15.x series to
8.13.11, but its more complicated than I initially thought. With help
from Balasankar, we tried to find more commits that would need to be
backported as well, but we are not able to fix it fully.
See https://bugs.debian.or
Hi team,
A review will help with unblock request.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858180#37
Losing diaspora-installer after putting years long effort would be very
demotivating.
thanks
Praveen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/28/2017 12:40 PM, Balasankar C wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, the template copyright file that is generated by gem2deb uses
> GPL-2.0+ as a placeholder license. Since a majority of the Ruby gems are
> under MIT/Expat license, can we use that instead? I had opened a bug[0]
> long back about
Hi,
Can someone review the patch? I noticed the version selected is 0.33.1
instead of expected 1.0.0. Can someone confirm if the gemspec is really
invalid (as reported by gem2deb #866198)?
Thanks
Praveen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On തിങ്കള് 17 ജൂലൈ 2017 10:05 വൈകു, David Goodenough wrote:
> Can I install two versions of ruby-asana at once (sorry I am a ruby newbie)
> or does gitlab need to be upgraded?
Thanks for the report. I did not consider this issue when updating
ruby-asana. New version of gitlab needs asana 0.6.0 bu
On ചൊവ്വ 18 ജൂലൈ 2017 12:49 വൈകു, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Do you have an idea?
see #867739 it is already implemented in git. If debian/gemspec is
available gem2deb will use that. You can just add a symlink.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Many tests are not failing because of newer webmock. at least 4
dependencies of gitlab failed (so I noticed)
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867645
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867649
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867654
https://bugs.
On വ്യാഴം 20 ജൂലൈ 2017 01:52 വൈകു, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Have you tried to rebuild that one in a local sbuild environment created
> by the setup script in pkg-ruby-extras ? It also fail for me in that
> case.
>
> I haven't tried the others -- I wanted to check if it was specific to
> the AWS reb
Hi,
I think we should use experimental for breaking changes (major updates)
and give time and notice for people to fix incompatibilites. I'm
referring to ruby-webmock and ruby-net-ssh updates, which should have
been uploaded to experimental and given people chance to fix dependencies.
Now gitlab
Hi,
I have uploaded rails 4.2.9 to experimental because autopkgtests for a
lot of reverse dependencies failed. Some of them may be unrelated
failures. A list of all packages that failed is at rails-4.2.9.txt in
https://wiki.debian.org/gobby.debian.org under Teams/RubyExtras
Please see if you can
Hi,
I have been trying to build ruby-grpc for last many weeks without
success. Current work can be found at
https://git.fosscommunity.in/praveen/grpc (under branch ruby).
RUBYLIB=.
GEM_PATH=debian/ruby-grpc/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/rubygems-integration/2.3.0:/var/lib/gems/2.3.0:/usr/lib/x86_64-li
On ചൊവ്വ 08 ആഗസ്റ്റ് 2017 02:20 രാവിലെ, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> You can try something like this in debian/ruby-tests.rake (untested):
>
> unless ENV['ADTTMP']
> # during the build, look for library in the source tree
> ENV['LD_LIBRARY_PATH'] = path_to_local_dir_containing_libgrpc_a
> end
>
On 2017, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 26 3:12:28 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
>I still consider myself part of the team, and will still help fixing
>stuff now and then (specially in the case of packages that I use), but
>my participation will be reduced so that I can focus on other things in
>Debian that I car
Hi,
I have just uploaded ruby-kaminari 1.0.1 to experimental. But since this
is a major update I'd like some help with updating/testing its reverse
dependencies.
obs-api, ruby-rails-admin
and reverse build dependencies
* open-build-service
* ruby-api-pagination
* ruby-rails-admin
Thanks
Pravee
Hi,
I have just created ruby-debugger-ruby-core-source in alioth (it is a
dependency of rblineprof which in turn is a dependency of gitlab 9.5.x).
Would it be enough to just use the .h files we ship in ruby2.3-dev? Or
can we include .inc files too in -dev package? I can see many more files
in the
On തിങ്കള് 11 സെപ്റ്റംബര് 2017 01:46 രാവിലെ, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I didn't look into details, but I could gather a few facts:
>
Thanks!
> 1) rblineprof is a _development_ tool, you
> should not have to package it to have gitlab in the archive.
>
gitlab mentions peek-rblineprof as a produ
Hi,
rainbow 2.2.2 introduced an 'ext' folder (this was not present in
earlier versions and this seems to be removed in git master) which makes
gem2deb think it is a native extension and creates an empty directory
causing lintian to report an error
E: ruby-rainbow: triplet-dir-and-architecture-mis
On തിങ്കള് 11 സെപ്റ്റംബര് 2017 05:18 വൈകു, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Remove the ext/ dir in dh_clean?
That won't be enough. We'll have to patch gemspec. It has the following line
spec.extensions= ["ext/mkrf_conf.rb"]
Also it will make git repo unclean, so if we are removing ext, I'
On 09/21/2017 06:47 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> After had a look in the spec/spec_helper.rb file I realized that it
> tries to use require with a relative path, and this will not work in a
> installed version. So, I think that you could create a patch to fix it,
> could you do it please?
>
> Chee
On 09/22/2017 06:02 PM, Sophie Brun wrote:
> I had also checked if there was another binary with this name in
> archive. I don't know if the best is to keep the upstream name or to
> change it to a less "generic" name (maybe gitlab-cli?).
I think gitlab-cli would be a better name for the package (
On ശനി 30 സെപ്റ്റംബര് 2017 08:50 വൈകു, Jan Luehr wrote:
> - Will the Ruby On Rails stack in Stretch receive security fixes during
> Stretch's lifetime?
I'd think it follows the same policy as any other package in stretch.
> - Can you recommend a template or howto for packing ror-applications for
Hi,
After a very long effort packaging countless Node.js modules and tools
like grunt, gulp, babel and webpack (I think at least 2 years must have
passed), I can finally build handlebars library in main. But when using
this version of the library in ruby-handlebars-assets, I get the
following erro
401 - 500 of 854 matches
Mail list logo
