Gunnar Wolf escreveu isso aí:
Paul van Tilburg dijo [Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:03:24AM +0200]:
Hello everyone,
I am at a conference this week and also away for the weekend.
Could someone have a look at RC bug #474724 if you have the time?
Umh... Looks quite simple to solve - We would
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:08:35PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
So we would only have to get (and I'm sorry, I'm completely lost in
this area) the proper CPU string for s390 and add it here. Blindly
asking Google makes me believe the proper string for the submitter's
environment (64-bit
On May 10, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
#if defined ARM || defined __arm__ || defined _ARM
# define POSH_CPU_STRONGARM 1
# define POSH_CPU_STRING ARM
#endif
So we would only have to get (and I'm sorry, I'm completely lost in
this area) the proper CPU string for s390 and add it
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:29:49AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-10
Severity: important
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:34:12AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
the build failure on s390 is unexpected; is it possible to extract a
test case?
| java:
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:08:35PM -0300]:
Besides #define'ing the proper symbols, there are issues like endianess
and other stuff that need to be properly defined for such architecture,
somewhere in posh.h, and it needs to be tested on an actual s390
machine.
Of course,
5 matches
Mail list logo
