Re: Fwd: -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2002-12-09 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 08 December 2002 21:30, Russell Coker wrote: OK, I'm getting exactly the same issues on S/390 (raptor) as I do on the ARM machines. The test program works fine for me. I have compiled it with gcc-2.95 on raptor. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 hole.cpp [EMAIL

Re: Fwd: -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2002-12-09 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 08 December 2002 21:30, Russell Coker wrote: OK, I'm getting exactly the same issues on S/390 (raptor) as I do on the ARM machines. Obviously I am doing something very wrong, could someone please tell me what it is? Maybe the problem is caused by some of the warnings like

Fwd: -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2002-12-08 Thread Russell Coker
OK, I'm getting exactly the same issues on S/390 (raptor) as I do on the ARM machines. Obviously I am doing something very wrong, could someone please tell me what it is? This list seems to get a faster response than debian-arm... Once I get this issue solved I'll have the entire user-space

Re: Fwd: -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2002-12-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:30:58PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: [...] i try to compile the test program. first it isn't c, so i need to fix it. i compile it with gcc 3.2 and -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. it seems to work fine. | $ ./test ./test1 1000 | Seeking to 1000 | $ ls -al test1 |