I actually find splitting "Science" a good idea.
I did a little research and came up with this list of possible
subsections, along with example fields they cover:
Astronomy
* Astrodynamics
* Astronomy
* Astrophysics
* Cosmology
* Radio astronomy
Biology
* Anatomy
* Bioinformatics
* Botan
Hello,
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 03:56, Russell Shaw wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 5/14/06, Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I suggest that the heirarchy be patterned after the organizational
> >> structure of the faculty of a major university. There is, I believe, a
> >>
Hello,
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 19:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Thomas Walter wrote:
[snip]
>
> > In general, my understanding of "Science" is in the sense of research
> > and not education.
> > Thus an example breakdown within Sience could be like
> >
Hello,
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 01:25, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[snip]
>
> Ok. Let's say, the main function/job/role makes the difference, so only
> applications which are real teaching programs (like e.g. tools to teach
> langauges or the PSE like kalzium or gperiodic) have to go into
> Education. A
4 matches
Mail list logo
