Re: Bug#489768: ITP: ngspice -- A Spice circuit simulator (fwd)

2008-07-09 Thread Manuel Prinz
Am Montag, den 07.07.2008, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > for ITPs that might interest Debian Med I would now go and add this > ITP to the tasks file in question. Any volunteeer to do this for > Debian Science and add this entry as prospective package to electronics? Done. (Hope I got the f

Re: future of blas/lapack/atlas packages?

2008-07-09 Thread David Bremner
> "Ondrej" == Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ondrej> Do you have experience with git packaging? I don't, but Ondrej> maybe we could try it, as it could be easier for all of us Ondrej> -- no need to joing any team, just git collab main. Debian science is also using git,

Re: future of blas/lapack/atlas packages?

2008-07-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Dirk! glad to see you around. On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (Doku and Camm re-added to CC --Dirk) > > On 8 July 2008 at 16:02, Ondrej Certik wrote: > | Hi, > | > | thanks Matthias for raising this issue. > > Seconded! > > This has always been

Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] joining debian-science and pkg-scicomp

2008-07-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote: It seems to me that all I need are quality packages and also make them work together. But maybe some other people need more also. If you are using Debian for 7 years you will need not much more. Try to convince a not-yet Debian user ... I like the pa

Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] joining debian-science and pkg-scicomp

2008-07-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> Great -- if it's internal to Debian, then all is fine. When I read >> that, I said -- hell no, I don't want another derivative. :) > > I really love people who think "hell no" if