Re: Torque in Debian?

2009-12-19 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:58:29PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote: > The FTP team is only human. I think. We should not bring Debian into trouble > just because we could not decide for ourselves and the FTP team made an error > in judgement. Also, I am not sure this is a useful position. It is the

Re: Torque in Debian?

2009-12-19 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:58:29PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote: > In my (updated) mind, what is not clearly free is non-free. So please explain which parts of the license you consider non-free and why. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Torque in Debian?

2009-12-19 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hello, Jordi Mallach wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:50:21PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: >> Oh, that. Yes it is a complicated situation, which doesn't get any >> better by the fact that the Torque maintainers don't give a d*mn >> about license issues. AFAIK several people have emailed them

Re: Torque in Debian?

2009-12-19 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:50:21PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: > Oh, that. Yes it is a complicated situation, which doesn't get any > better by the fact that the Torque maintainers don't give a d*mn > about license issues. AFAIK several people have emailed them about > it and they never answer.