On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: > > DSCPackages = {source1, source2, ...} # there could be multiple > > or > > DEBPackages = {binary1, binary2, ...}
> > so that .bib is sufficient to point to the corresponding package(s) > > ? > There is the (not yet documented Field[1]) "Debian-Package" where you > can restrict a citation to a certain binary package. I saw it -- but this one is to be defined in debian/upstream. It is not present atm in the generated .bib file where Debian-Package (if we just maintain the same name as a name of bibtex field, may be just remove '-' since I am not sure if that is supported in bibtex, i.e. DebianPackage) could be automatically filled up -- you already have package names in the .tex table you generate, but not in .bib (which is what I whined about) > There is no real solution for having one citation for more than one > source and binary packages (and I have no idea how to implement this > with the current system). wouldn't it come natively if I have a copy of debian/upstream with references in multiple source packages? -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120831131358.gc2...@onerussian.com