Re: TI-calculator packages team maintained in debian-edu or debian-science on alioth?

Hi Holger et. al, [cc debian-science, related post: https://lists.debian.org/debian-edu/2013/06/msg00177.html>] On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:54:05PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Freitag, 14. Juni 2013, Andreas B. Mundt wrote: > > libticables-1.3.4 > > libtifiles-1.1.6 > > libticonv-1.1.4 >

Re: TI-calculator packages team maintained in debian-edu or debian-science on alioth?

Hi Andi, On Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, Andreas B. Mundt wrote: > I had a look at the debian-science alioth repository, they use a > subdirectory 'packages' for packaging [1]. So I suggest to follow > that convention and put the source packages in debian-edu/packages/ > like: > > debian-edu/packages

RE: Distribution of non-GPL models with GPL Software (Was: [Qucs-devel] Closed bugs)

Adding the debian maintainer, and debian-science list to make sure there aren't distribution objections before I start verifying everything. Some background: I would like to include some vendor specific SPICE models with Qucs, which are not under the GPL, but a license which (I hope) to be compl