packages which are actually GPL2 only

hi andreas, i've just figured out that a bunch of my packages are being rejected for containing the "or (at your option) a later version" when they are GPL2 only :/ i have committed the fixes, and the following packages are now ready: r-cran-elliptic r-cran-pbapply r-cran-estimability r-cran-mod

ITP: arb -- C library for arbitrary-precision floating-point ball arithmetic

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Julien Puydt * Package name: arb Version : 2.7.0 Upstream Author : Fredrik Johansson * URL : https://github.com/fredrik-johansson/arb * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : C library for arbitrary-pr

Bug#797820: ITP: r-cran-bayesfactor -- GNU R package providing a suite of functions for computing various Bayes factors for simple designs

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonathon * Package name: r-cran-bayesfactor Version : 0.9.11-1 Upstream Author : Richard D. Morey * URL : http://bayesfactorpcl.r-forge.r-project.org/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: R, C Description : GNU R pa

Bug#797819: ITP: r-cran-afex -- GNU R package providing convenience functions for analyzing factorial experiments using ANOVA or mixed models

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonathon * Package name: r-cran-afex Version : 0.14-2 Upstream Author : Henrik Singmann * URL : https://github.com/singmann/afex * License : GPL Programming Lang: R Description : GNU R package providing convenien

Bug#797818: ITP: r-cran-coin -- GNU R package providing conditional inference procedures for the general independence problem

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonathon * Package name: r-cran-coin Version : 1.1-0 Upstream Author : Torsten Hothorn * URL : http://coin.r-forge.r-project.org/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: R, C Description : GNU R package providing condi

Re: r-cran-desolve: lintian warnings

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:54:41PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > >$ gbp clone > > ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-cran-desolve.git > > gbp:error: Git command failed: Error running git checkout: error: pathspec > > 'master' did not match any file(s) known to git. > > oh sor

Re: r-cran-desolve: lintian warnings

ACK for what Anton wrote and to Jonathon please push your repository: $ gbp clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/r-cran-desolve.git gbp:error: Git command failed: Error running git checkout: error: pathspec 'master' did not match any file(s) known to git. BTW, I uploaded r-

Re: r-cran-rinside good to go

On 2 September 2015 at 17:26, Andreas Tille wrote: | Hi Jonathon, | | On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:09:59PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: | > > | > > I would have loved if the patch would have been discussed - IMHO it is | > > sensible. | > | > oh ok. still figuring out how much autonomy i'm suppose

Re: r-cran-rinside good to go

Hi Jonathon, On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:09:59PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > > > > I would have loved if the patch would have been discussed - IMHO it is > > sensible. > > oh ok. still figuring out how much autonomy i'm supposed to exhibit. i > do like to lead with a concrete implementation - a

Re: r-cran-rinside good to go

On 2 September 2015 at 15:09, Jonathon Love wrote: | fixed now. a lot of these R packages don't do you any favours coming up | with a < 80 char description. Simply a different (if related in spirit and scope) spec -- R itself has rather stringent checks in 'R CMD check ...' which, not unlike lint

Re: r-cran-desolve: lintian warnings

Hi, 2015-09-02 15:25 GMT+02:00 Jonathon Love : > I: r-cran-desolve: spelling-error-in-binary > usr/lib/R/site-library/deSolve/libs/deSolve.so BANDWITH BANDWIDTH If you want you can patch the source. But if you think it can break something, just override it and report a bug to upstream. It is not

r-cran-desolve: lintian warnings

hi, in packaging the R package deSolve, and i get several warnings: I: r-cran-desolve: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/R/site-library/deSolve/libs/deSolve.so BANDWITH BANDWIDTH W: r-cran-desolve: package-contains-timestamped-gzip usr/lib/R/site-library/deSolve/doc/source/ddaspkcomments.txt.gz W:

Re: r-cran-rinside good to go

hey andreas, >> i had to do some patching, which i wouldn't mind some feedback on. > > I would have loved if the patch would have been discussed - IMHO it is > sensible. oh ok. still figuring out how much autonomy i'm supposed to exhibit. i do like to lead with a concrete implementation - and wa

[Caffe] uploaded to mentors but NOT RFS

Hi all, (CC'ing people interested in package Caffe) It takes so long time for Caffe to be packaged for Debian, now the package is nearly prepared to be uploaded, and there are still some small issues to be addressed. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/caffe.git My local build

Re: r-cran-rinside good to go

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:40:32PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote: > hi andreas. > > r-cran-rinside should be good to go. This is discussed separately. > i had to do some patching, which i wouldn't mind some feedback on. I would have loved if the patch would have been discussed - IMHO it is sensib

Re: r-cran-rinside good to go

>> Why did anyone think filing 797575 was a good idea in the first place, >> rather than talking to me first? > > It is necessary to talk to somebody to file a bug? > Jonathan decided to maintain the package, he has right to > do it. oh, i think dirk has a point. i thought it would be a nic