Re: R package CI test failures

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Tille
More fixes below: On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > My only idea is to rather use > >pkg=r-bioc-`echo $oname | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'` > > and so I try this even if I think this is equivalent. This seems to work. > > r-bioc-aroma.light: attempts install.packages

Re: R package CI test failures

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:42:45AM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > > me. My only idea is to rather use > > > >pkg=r-bioc-`echo $oname | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'` > > > > and so I try this even if I think this is equivalent. > > Hmm, yes. I can't obviously see why this fails. (Aside - `tr A-Z a-z` > w

Re: toulbar2: another try ?

2016-04-28 Thread Thomas Schiex
Oops. I had forgotten to include the debian directory. This is now corrected. Thomas

Re: R package CI test failures

2016-04-28 Thread Gordon Ball
On 28/04/16 00:22, Andreas Tille wrote: > [Jonathon, please seek for your name in the text below.] > > Hi Gordon, > > thanks a lot for your effort about testing R packages. > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:00:05PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: >> >> non-lowercased path for vignette: output contains so

Re: Post-Receive Hooks

2016-04-28 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi James, thank you very much for your investigations! Since I "forked" debian-asto off from debian-science, I feel responsible for the parts concerning astro. However, I must say that I don't completely understand the hooks completely. I tried to patch the directories and the ./setup-repository

Re: R package CI test failures

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Continued my previous mail: > r-cran-sp: missing dep rgeos (unpackaged?) As far as I can see rgeos is not yet packaged. Any volunteer? Otherwise tweaking the tests requiring this package might be an intermediate solution. > r-cran-surveillance: unsatisfyable dependencies New upstream version u