Re: R package CI test failures

Hi Gordon, thanks for your investigation. On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 04:05:22PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > Having had a better look at some of the less obvious failings: > > r-bioc-biocparallel > --- > > Non-deterministic? Seems to fail about 80% of the time in > test_bpaggregate.

Request for sponsoring r-cran-tgp and r-cran-maptree

Hi, I have updated r-cran-tgp [1] to the latest upstream version (2.4-14), which fixes #820866. The new upstream version requires a new dependency, r-cran-maptree [2], which I just packaged (ITP #823320). Could somebody please upload these packages ? Thanks, Pablo [1]

Re: SuperLU

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:17:42PM +, Nico Schlömer wrote: > I've imported the repo into [1] where I'll do some work, it's missing the pristine-tar branch. Please also import the pristine-tar details into the repository. Given that apparently your gbp config doesn't have 'pristine-tar = True'

Re: SuperLU

I've imported the repo into [1] where I'll do some work, later this week we can move it to alioth. Cheers, Nico [1] https://github.com/nschloe/debian-superlu On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:34 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 01:14:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Tue, May 0

Re: R package CI test failures

Having had a better look at some of the less obvious failings: r-bioc-biocparallel --- Non-deterministic? Seems to fail about 80% of the time in test_bpaggregate.R when calling bpworkers(param) <- 2 This is the only call to bpworkers() in the test suite, but I can't obviousl

Re: SuperLU

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 01:14:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:48:24AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > @Mattia would you mind moving SuperLU over to /git? > > Conversion ongoing. > Will notify once done. Well, it has been super quick, probably because there is basica

Re: SuperLU

[ keeping only the list in the recipients. But you did good at mailing me explicitly, otherwise I'd have ignored this email ] On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:48:24AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote: > @Mattia would you mind moving SuperLU over to /git? Conversion ongoing. Will notify once done. -- regar

Re: SuperLU

Thanks! > That's worth a bug report "New version available" via reportbug. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823213 > The best way to tackle this is IMHO becoming a member of Debian Science team, I already am. :) > fix it in VCS (may be by moving packaging to Git) a Very good.

Re: SuperLU

Hi Nico, On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:30:03AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > So if you have a real question rather than this meta-question you should > ask it here. > > Yup, well, SuperLU in Debian is pretty outdated and the new version allows > for a much simpler build process. That's worth a bu

Re: SuperLU

Thanks for the info! > So if you have a real question rather than this meta-question you should ask it here. Yup, well, SuperLU in Debian is pretty outdated and the new version allows for a much simpler build process. The debian config can probably be improved. I was going to ask how this could b

Re: SuperLU

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Nico Schlömer > wrote: > > Does anyone know who is the current maintainer for SuperLU [1] and where to > > find the debian repo? > > The maintainer is Debian Science Maintainers and the debian repo

Bug#823308: ITP: caffe-contrib -- a deep learning framework, compiled with CUDA

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: lumin X-Debbugs-CC: costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it, ghisv...@gmail.com, debian-science@lists.debian.org Hi, #788539 is cpu version of caffe, this is CUDA version. CPU version goes into main section while this CUDA version goes into contrib section. * Pack

Re: Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

Hi, >set(CFLAGS ...) which should be replaced by set(CFLAGS $(CFLAGS) ...) > >An upstream classic unfortunately. as upstream I did this once, and the side effect was something weird. when you run multiple times cmake .. the cflags gets appended multiple times, so you might end up in a really w

Re: SuperLU

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Does anyone know who is the current maintainer for SuperLU [1] and where to > find the debian repo? The maintainer is Debian Science Maintainers and the debian repo is available in debian-science svn repo: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d

SuperLU

Hi everyone, Does anyone know who is the current maintainer for SuperLU [1] and where to find the debian repo? Cheers, Nico [1] https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/superlu

Re: Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

On 03/05/16 03:08, lumin wrote: - d/*.install.in: no multi-arch install paths? why? I have no plan to make multiarch support for this package, because that makes no sense. In production environment Caffe is a computational intensive and memory-consuming application, and I believe no user will n