Re: G+Smo packaging

Dear Angelos, On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:46:57PM +0200, Angelos Mantzaflaris wrote: > In brief, I am looking for a sponsor for a new package in > debian-science. The deiban folder is now at > > https://salsa.debian.org/filiatra-guest/gismo Thank you for your patience. I admit I'm a bit sad

Re: G+Smo packaging

Dear all, In brief, I am looking for a sponsor for a new package in debian-science. The deiban folder is now at https://salsa.debian.org/filiatra-guest/gismo thank you in advance Angelos

Re: Freecad is looking for new maintainers

Greetings, Anton, On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:47:02PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: Hi, thanks all for opinions. I should probably do it and orphan packages, where the uploader-list is empty... Not much of them but still. With freecad I will wait till the answer from Adam or when his status will

Re: Freecad is looking for new maintainers

Great to hear it! Feel free to ping me if you need a review/sponsorship. AFAIK Leopold has also some interest in this package (in CC), so please coordinate the efforts with him. Thanks Anton 2018-05-24 21:43 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Kuzminsky : > On 05/23/2018 03:17 PM, Anton

Re: Freecad is looking for new maintainers

On 05/23/2018 03:17 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > freecad_0.16.6712+dfsg1-2 has just been uploaded and > two of its maintainers (me and Teemu) decided not to maintain > this package any more. Adam, which is currently the only > one in "Uploaders"-field seems to be not active for a long time. > > I am

Re: Freecad is looking for new maintainers

Hi, thanks all for opinions. I should probably do it and orphan packages, where the uploader-list is empty... Not much of them but still. With freecad I will wait till the answer from Adam or when his status will be changed to MIA. Best regards Anton 2018-05-24 12:10 GMT+02:00 Graham Inggs

Re: Freecad is looking for new maintainers

Hi Adam Please let us know if you intend maintaining the freecad package going forward. Teemu and Anton will no longer be maintaining it (see below), so if you won't be maintaining it, I agree with Sébastien that orphaning the package would better match reality. Regards Graham On

Re: On fplll 5.2.1

Ok, On 24/05/18 10:38, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi > Le 24 mai 2018 07:03, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : >> >> I am confused here: >> do you mean that the dependant packages must be uploaded with a build-dep on >> = 5.2.0 ? >> > > The current fpylll isn't compatible with the

Re: On fplll 5.2.1

Hi Le 24 mai 2018 07:03, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : > > I am confused here: > do you mean that the dependant packages must be uploaded with a build-dep on > = 5.2.0 ? > The current fpylll isn't compatible with the next fplll, so I think it's better to reupload it with a