People used to rasmol interface will likely prefer rasmol over X (pymol,
viewmol, I like qutemol too for rendering..).
For these users, it will take some time before rasmol becomes obsoleted
by pymol or more recent WebGL based molecular viewers such as NGL (MIT
licence,
On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 15:25 +0100, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 3 July 2018 at 14:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the bug log of #790196[1] shows that rasmol in its current state
> > will
> > not be distributable with Buster. Upstream is dead so if we want
> > to
> > keep it in Debian we
On 3 July 2018 at 14:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the bug log of #790196[1] shows that rasmol in its current state will
> not be distributable with Buster. Upstream is dead so if we want to
> keep it in Debian we have the option:
>
>1) Port it to Gtk+ 3 (see porting guide [2])
>2)
Dear Andreas,
My apologies for the regrettable git pushing. The debian mechanics is
hard to decipher when you are not used to it.
In all cases, many thanks for the additional clarification. I understand
you are busy, so don't spend time reading / answering this mail.
My answers for the list:
Hi,
the bug log of #790196[1] shows that rasmol in its current state will
not be distributable with Buster. Upstream is dead so if we want to
keep it in Debian we have the option:
1) Port it to Gtk+ 3 (see porting guide [2])
2) Find a Gtk+ 2 replacement for libvte
3) Give up and remove
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:18:19AM +0200, Thomas Schiex wrote:
> Thanks a lot, the uscan worked fine! Excited with this, I did this:
>
> - I integrated your commit in our upstream git repo (with thanks :-)
Why? Its fully sufficient in
6 matches
Mail list logo
