Re: libscotch-dev/7.0.1-2: Why is there no libscotchmetis.so?

2022-03-18 Thread Markus Blatt
Am Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:51:38PM +0100 schrieb Drew Parsons: As for /usr/share/dune/cmake/modules/FindMETIS.cmake, it does handle the scotchmetis version via METIS_API_VERSION If it's then going to look for find_library(METIS_LIBRARY scotchmetis), then for scotch 7 that should be updated to

Re: libscotch-dev/7.0.1-2: Why is there no libscotchmetis.so?

2022-03-18 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2022-03-18 23:13, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2022-03-18 21:50, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi, while investigating several bugs [1] [2] [3] caused by the scotch transition, I started wondering why there is no libscotchmetis.so library but just libscotchmetisv3.so and libscotchmetisv5.so. .. It would

Re: libscotch-dev/7.0.1-2: Why is there no libscotchmetis.so?

2022-03-18 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2022-03-18 21:50, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi, while investigating several bugs [1] [2] [3] caused by the scotch transition, I started wondering why there is no libscotchmetis.so library but just libscotchmetisv3.so and libscotchmetisv5.so. The cause for the bugs seems to be that the CMake scri

libscotch-dev/7.0.1-2: Why is there no libscotchmetis.so?

2022-03-18 Thread Markus Blatt
Hi, while investigating several bugs [1] [2] [3] caused by the scotch transition, I started wondering why there is no libscotchmetis.so library but just libscotchmetisv3.so and libscotchmetisv5.so. The cause for the bugs seems to be that the CMake scripts only search for libscotchmetis.so. This

Re: Updating qiskit-* packages?

2022-03-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:01:01PM +0100, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote: > What would be the most sensible way to signal either that help would be > needed, or that the effort has stopped? We informally thought of > orphaning the package, but if there is indeed interest, might not be the > best approach

Re: Updating qiskit-* packages?

2022-03-18 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Hello Nilesh, On 3/13/22 8:26 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Since they are > important/interesting packages for quantum computing, I wished to ask if you > might > have plans to update it to latest upstream in near future? Or have worked on > it locally maybe? Unfortunately, the answer to both que