Re: advice/help needed for including new software in debian (science)

2013-11-25 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > thanks for your interest in Debian Science. > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 06:29:32AM -0200, Felipe Figueiredo wrote: >> I have developed two scientific simulators of biological interest >> [1,2],

advice/help needed for including new software in debian (science)

2013-11-23 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
I have developed two scientific simulators of biological interest [1,2], and want to include them in Debian. As a former Debian user (currently using Ubuntu), and an avid FOSS supporter I want to make sure they get the deserved treatment getting included in major distributions, starting with Debian

Re: Bug#507529: ITP: bauble -- Bauble is a biodiversity collection manager software application

2008-12-15 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 01:59:01 Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:16:25AM -0200, Felipe Figueiredo a écrit : > > Are there any plans to also package Dotur? > > > > http://schloss.micro.umass.edu/software/dotur.html > > Hi Felipe, > > we c

Re: Bug#507529: ITP: bauble -- Bauble is a biodiversity collection manager software application

2008-12-02 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 12:59 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:16:25AM -0200, Felipe Figueiredo a écrit : > > > > Are there any plans to also package Dotur? > > > > http://schloss.micro.umass.edu/software/dotur.html > > Hi Felipe, >

Re: Bug#507529: ITP: bauble -- Bauble is a biodiversity collection manager software application

2008-12-02 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 22:25:51 Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:12:46AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi a écrit : > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > * Package name: bauble > > Version : 0.8.5 > > Upstrea

Re: Package categories

2008-08-05 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
On Monday 04 August 2008 13:58:51 Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 19:28 +0100, Chris Walker wrote: > > Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote: > > > > And http://www.opennovation.org/ provides a much better > > > > ca

Re: Package categories

2008-07-25 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
On Thursday 24 July 2008 03:29:00 Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > > === Finite Element Analysis === > > proposed -- field::physics:fea > > (it isn't clear to me that this should be in physics rather than > > engineering, so maybe field::fea would be better) In the particular example of FE, it's "m

Re: [Announce] New tasks web Bpages for all CDDs

2008-07-06 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
On Wednesday 02 July 2008 10:14:35 Chris Walker wrote: > As a physicist I can see arguments for them being in Mathematics, > Engineering and Physics. There is an argument for them being close to > symbolic maths packages such as maxima. Am I missing something, or packages can't be in more than on